-----Original Message----- From: Jeff Chan [mailto:jeffc@surbl.org] Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 5:28 PM To: SURBL Discussion list (E-mail) Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] The beast has been fed. 6dos now in WS.surbl.org
On Monday, June 28, 2004, 12:31:24 PM, Chris Santerre wrote:
The '6dos' project domains have now been fed into
ws.surbl.org. This is a
huge collection of spam domains. The reason I did this now
is the format is
changing and it would have been a nightmare to do this later.
I briefly looked thru them, but there are a LOT. I expect a
few FPs. But for
the shear number of domains you can't beat it. I will remove
any reported
FPs. Bill if you want to whitelist some if I can't get to
them right away,
go ahead. I will post when I remove, or if they are spammers and the whitelist needs to be removed.
This is a great addition. And NO I can't tell you the source
of the '6dos'
project. You will just have to contact me with any questions :)
NO!!!!!!! DO NOT DO THIS.
Stop yelling or I'll start calling you my wife ;) DOn't think I won't.....honey! :P
Rich's list is way too big and inaccurate for our use in terms of false positives. It will ruin SURBLs and people's use of them.
Yes and no. But have a look at the file I posted.
The huge list is probably the reason Bill's server is choking now.
Damn I hope it wasn't the list that killed it! That would suck! But size wise it didn't look any bigger then some of the other lists people had submitted.
But I have no problems making this a seperate SURBL list. The data is very good once you look at it.
Sorry if I seem testy. I'm on a 3 week schedule of no Hockey. I'm ready to kill at a moments notice :)
--Chris
On Monday, June 28, 2004, 4:54:33 PM, Chris Santerre wrote:
From: Jeff Chan [mailto:jeffc@surbl.org]
On Monday, June 28, 2004, 12:31:24 PM, Chris Santerre wrote:
The '6dos' project domains have now been fed into
ws.surbl.org. This is a
huge collection of spam domains.
NO!!!!!!! DO NOT DO THIS.
Stop yelling
Yeah sorry about that. I'm not too comfortable with large, unexpected changes, especially to production systems.
Rich's list is way too big and inaccurate for our use in terms of false positives. It will ruin SURBLs and people's use of them.
Yes and no. But have a look at the file I posted.
Let's let the data speak for itself as people beta test it as a separate list.
The huge list is probably the reason Bill's server is choking now.
Damn I hope it wasn't the list that killed it! That would suck! But size wise it didn't look any bigger then some of the other lists people had submitted.
Bill didn't seem to think it caused a problem.
...But my adding expired domains as whitelist entries (since removed) *did* apparently cause the server grief....
Jeff C.
-
Chris Santerre -
Jeff Chan