I have an SURBL submission from a VERY reputible person. With a very good explanation as to how the email address spam'd should NEVER have gotten this email. Now according to WS policy it would NOT be listed because it may have legit uses. Therefore I'm adding it to UC not WS.
zatz.com is the domain.
http://zatzhq.zatz.com/privacy
Pretty much says it will do whatever it wants with your address. Which in this case was harvested, not OptIn. And After trying to unsub the address, the spam floodgates opened for it.
Chris Santerre System Admin and SARE Ninja http://www.rulesemporium.com http://www.surbl.org 'It is not the strongest of the species that survives, not the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.' Charles Darwin
On Monday, October 25, 2004, 8:45:24 AM, Chris Santerre wrote:
I have an SURBL submission from a VERY reputible person. With a very good explanation as to how the email address spam'd should NEVER have gotten this email. Now according to WS policy it would NOT be listed because it may have legit uses. Therefore I'm adding it to UC not WS.
Actually that's more of a SURBL policy than a WS one. We don't want false positives on SURBLs because they make the lists less usable.
Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."
-
Chris Santerre -
Jeff Chan