*snip*
Thanks for your stats and checking, and yes please anyone else with ham corpora, please check for FPs.
There is one SARE ninja testing guru that will come online with SURBL when 3.0 is released. I expect a LOT of testing, because he is addicted to it :) He's actually been trying to work with another ninja to test for SURBL FPs already. But the initial tests failed :(
So we should have a really great tester online soon.
With human errors, I think an SO ratio of 99% is pretty cool. OF course we won't even have that unless we strive for zero FPs. Its a goal. I hand check pretty much everything, but sometimes one slips by :)
--Chris
On Tuesday, September 7, 2004, 6:42:05 AM, Chris Santerre wrote:
There is one SARE ninja testing guru that will come online with SURBL when 3.0 is released. I expect a LOT of testing, because he is addicted to it :) He's actually been trying to work with another ninja to test for SURBL FPs already. But the initial tests failed :(
So we should have a really great tester online soon.
Excellent news!
With human errors, I think an SO ratio of 99% is pretty cool. OF course we won't even have that unless we strive for zero FPs. Its a goal. I hand check pretty much everything, but sometimes one slips by :)
--Chris
It's good have have more testing to try to close the loop by checking things. Things are still a little too open ended probably. Additional feedback and testing should be able to improve our accuracy.
Jeff C.