Hi,
I've keep getting the same spam every now and then. I think i have reported this spam atleast 4 times on the submission form at rulesemporium.com.
How come it won't be listed?
The domain in the spam is http://www.pinksheetsMUNGED.com and the spam is about stocks. I get this spam reported almost every day from different users in our organization.
This is 100% spam!
When will this be added to multi? I can send the message in original if you want, just let me know.
Thank you
/ Martin
Hi,
I've keep getting the same spam every now and then. I think i have reported this spam atleast 4 times on the submission form at rulesemporium.com.
How come it won't be listed?
The domain in the spam is http://www.pinksheetsMUNGED.com and the spam is about stocks. I get this spam reported almost every day from different users in our organization.
Stocks spams don't advertise websites of spams but stocks the spammer owns.
pinksheets.com is a domain created in 1996. It's in the SURBL whitelist. It not only has > 400 NANAS sightings but also 50 misc.invest.stocks sightings, i.e. legitimate uses.
Joe
Joe Wein wrote:
Stocks spams don't advertise websites of spams but stocks the spammer owns.
pinksheets.com is a domain created in 1996. It's in the SURBL whitelist. It not only has > 400 NANAS sightings but also 50 misc.invest.stocks sightings, i.e. legitimate uses.
Hi Joe,
Ok, can you (or someone else) please give me an advice how to stop this spam? I'm using different SARE rules and others, but it won't catch this spam. Since my first post i've recieved about five more of this spam.
Spam attached.
Thanks in advance.
/ Martin
Received: from aspam@_mydomain_.com (192.168.2.80 [192.168.2.80]) by exchangeserver.id.local with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id VAQVTM0S; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 11:19:39 +0100 Received: by aspam@_mydomain_.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 47A2713889; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 11:19:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from 218-162-208-81.dynamic.hinet.net (218-162-208-81.dynamic.hinet.net [218.162.208.81]) by aspam@_mydomain_.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C46713886; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 11:19:32 +0100 (CET) Subject: Personal Investment Advise Message-ID: TYBJpb8R3.oSPjiDCpYQ6@tegucigalpa9.fourfa.com From: "Meredith Hudson" watermellon@emosaustin.com To: "Meredith Hudson" watermellon@emosaustin.com Cc: bengt.lundahl@_mydomain_, christian.kapusta@_mydomain_, info@_mydomain_, johnny.nilsson@_mydomain_ Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 06:10:24 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--5_MFSMan2H9.hXUsvTYlLP5" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on aspam@_mydomain_.com X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK,RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.63
----5_MFSMan2H9.hXUsvTYlLP5 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
----5_MFSMan2H9.hXUsvTYlLP5 Content-Type: text/html; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
----5_MFSMan2H9.hXUsvTYlLP5--
<html>Please review this entire email about:<br> Motion DNA<br><br>
Pink Sheets Stock Symbol MTDN<br> <a href="http://www.pinksheets.com/quote/quote.jsp?symbol=mtdn">http://www.pinksheets.com/quote/quote.jsp?symbol=mtdn</a> <br><br> Big year expected in 2005 for Motion DNA<br> <br> Trading Symbol MTDN<br> Current Price (est.) $0.025<br> Valued Price (est.) $1.00<br><br>
First time investors please read this:<br> <a href="http://www.pinksheets.com/otcguide/investors_howtobuy.jsp">http://www.pinksheets.com/otcguide/investors_howtobuy.jsp</a> <br><br> Company officials expect to make the move to become a reporting company, due to their high expectations Motion DNA may surpass revenue projections for 2005. Currently with almost $500,000 in assets, zero debt, and increasing interest in its franchise program, company officials term the financial viability of Motion DNA as "solid". "All of the road blocks appear to be removed and Motion DNA expects to increase its market presence in the sports medicine industry and improve company revenues substantially," said Zig Ziegler, President of Motion DNA. "We can now focus on increasing customer awareness and sales of our products and services." <br><br> In a move expected to provide future franchisees with access to a solid customer base, Motion DNA officials have agreed to terms with one of the nation's leading health club chains with over 430 locations in the US and Europe. Motion DNA is expected to launch its first analysis center in one of the club?s Arizona locations. Franchisees will be awarded locations as part of their territories. A formal announcement is expected within the coming weeks. <br><br> Motion DNA is scheduled to demonstrate its newest pitching and overhead analysis at the upcoming Minor League Baseball Tradeshow. The tradeshow, scheduled for December 10, 11, and 12, coincides with the annual Winter Meetings for Major League Baseball. Representatives from more than 200 Major League and Minor League Baseball clubs, leagues and organizations typically attend the Baseball Trade Show during their annual meetings. In addition, baseball representatives, coaches, and organizers from Independent League, College, High School and Little League, as well as other baseball affiliated organizations are invited to attend the Baseball Trade Show. Current Major League Player Ramon Hernandez of the San Diego Padres and an endorser of Motion DNA is expected to attend the event and assist in promoting the company to his big league peers. Canadian Olympian Fastpitch Softball Player Lauren Bay, is also expected to attend the tradeshow along with other company officials <br><br> More about Motion DNA <br> Motion DNA Corporation provides diagnostic testing for medical professionals and sports organizations. Motion DNA's biomechanical analyses and detailed reports provide its licensees and consumers with solutions for preventing injuries, identifying physical limitations, diagnosing pre-existing injuries related to biomechanics, and improving physical performance levels. </html>
On Tuesday, November 16, 2004, 12:24:50 AM, Martin Martin wrote:
Joe Wein wrote:
Stocks spams don't advertise websites of spams but stocks the spammer owns.
pinksheets.com is a domain created in 1996. It's in the SURBL whitelist. It not only has > 400 NANAS sightings but also 50 misc.invest.stocks sightings, i.e. legitimate uses.
Ok, can you (or someone else) please give me an advice how to stop this spam? I'm using different SARE rules and others, but it won't catch this spam. Since my first post i've recieved about five more of this spam.
Hi Martin, As Joe says, since the stock spams usually don't have URIs belonging to the spammers, we can't usually catch them with SURBLs. Perhaps there is a SARE rule which will catch these. You may want to ask on the SpamAssassin Users mailing list.
Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."
Jeff Chan wrote:
Hi Martin, As Joe says, since the stock spams usually don't have URIs belonging to the spammers, we can't usually catch them with SURBLs. Perhaps there is a SARE rule which will catch these. You may want to ask on the SpamAssassin Users mailing list.
Hi Jeff,
I'm aware of that :( Thanks, i'll give it a try on the SA-list.
/ Martin
Hi Joe,
Ok, can you (or someone else) please give me an advice how to stop this spam? I'm using different SARE rules and others, but it won't catch this spam. Since my first post i've recieved about five more of this spam.
Hi Martin,
for my own spam filter these stock spams have just about the highest rate of false negatives, along with diploma spams that only list a phone number. But I accept that because I'd hate to swap that for a higher FP rate.
At least stock spams don't include sexually explicit content and are not sent in huge volume. They are relatively benign as long as you are aware that whatever they recommend is worthless :-)
I award points for terms such as
"Pink Sheets:" "OTCBB" "OTC BB" "OTC Bulletin Board" "OTC:"
as well as
"forward-looking statements" "forward looking statements" "Section 27A" "Securities Act of 1933" "Section 21B" "Exchange Act of 1934"
If I get some points on top of this for direct-to-mx delivery, sending from SBL/XBL-listed servers, delivery from certain countries, recognizable ratware mailer, etc. then this is enough to catch it for me. Otherwise it just slips under the radar screen.
Joe