-----Original Message----- From: Alex Broens [mailto:surbl@alexb.ch] Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 9:52 AM To: SURBL Discussion list Subject: Re: [SPAM-TAG] [SURBL-Discuss] Spammer threatening to suesingle4y ou.net
Chris Santerre wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Jeff Chan [mailto:jeffc@surbl.org] Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 8:18 PM To: Frank Ellermann Cc: discuss@lists.surbl.org Subject: Re: [SPAM-TAG] [SURBL-Discuss] Spammer threatening to suesingle4y ou.net
On Monday, September 27, 2004, 5:12:16 PM, Frank Ellermann wrote:
Jeff Chan wrote:
"A. Add domains that appear only in spam. Do not add any domains that appear in ham."
As an absolute rule that won't work, because the criminal spammer talks with his rogue registrar in "ham".
I don't consider spammer's messages to be ham. Only ham from legitimate people (non-spammers) is ordinary ham.
Jeff C.
"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."
Oh yeah single4you.net is realy legit.... and I'm the queen
of England.
Their site is back up, with personal ads that show picts of
people. Too bad
one of the pics is snoop dog, and another is Conan the Barbarian!!
LOL
http://www.single4you.net/membership/homepage.aspx?mid=10980&vi
sside=true
:-) I read the snoop dog and conan ones.
--Chris ( ilike ot play cricket chess)
-
Chris Santerre