... On Tuesday, November 8, 2005, 5:12:52 AM, List User wrote:
So, Jeff, can the tripod.com domain just be treated as if itwere a two-level TLD for SURBL? Another pair are ianampolkcho tripod.com and armonmafinneywilco tripod.com (Yes, they have been reported).
For those keeping score, the systems are not currently set up to work that way, both on the data side and probably also on the application side. I'm not sure how smart we are to let the spammers know this. :-(
BTW. He's also using the CNET redirector again (clearly CNET'spolicy of blacklisting instead of whitelisting doesn't work).
Perhaps you mean whitelisting instead of blacklisting?
Jeff C.
Don't harm innocent bystanders.
Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.surbl.org http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Unfortunately I meant it the way I wrote it; CNET blacklists sites *after* complaints - They should whitelist sites that have paid or contracted with them instead of blacklisting sites people complain about. You assumed that they were acting rationally, which should be a good assumption, but isn't in this case. However I did mean to use redirectors (plural, not singular - they have many in their various domains).
Paul Shupak track@plectere.com
On Tuesday, November 8, 2005, 5:42:50 AM, List User wrote:
Unfortunately I meant it the way I wrote it; CNET blacklistssites *after* complaints - They should whitelist sites that have paid or contracted with them instead of blacklisting sites people complain about. You assumed that they were acting rationally, which should be a good assumption, but isn't in this case. However I did mean to use redirectors (plural, not singular - they have many in their various domains).
Thanks for the clarification. Well, at least they're doing something about abuse. Their blacklisting is better than doing nothing.
Jeff C. -- Don't harm innocent bystanders.
-
Jeff Chan -
List Mail User