-----Original Message----- From: Jeff Chan [mailto:jeffc@surbl.org] Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 1:01 AM To: Joe Wein Cc: SURBL Discussion list Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] FP?: ultimatebizsource.biz
On Thursday, October 14, 2004, 8:43:40 PM, Joe Wein wrote:
ultimatebizsource.biz claims to be an opt-in list with
55,000 subscribers.
It's currently listed on [WS] and [JP] but not my personal list.
I know, the name alone sounds like your typical spammer
domain, but is it?
Today the owner of getyoursiteongoogle.info mailed me, since I had blacklisted their domain.
Turns out the evidence was a mailing from
ultimatebizsource.biz which was
listed on WS and JP. Since the recipient was a third party from the Prolocation feed, I could not easily verify if it was indeed
unsolicited,
but I checked what I could check quickly.
To my surprize the outgoing mailserver's IP is not listed on
any of the RBLs
and neither are the name servers or the resolved name.
There is only 1 NANAS sighting for this almost one year old
domain. That
posting is an automated one, and probably related to an
ahbl.org listing
mentioned in the SA-tags added to the evidence mail. I can
find no listing
for them at ahbl.org now.
A web search for the domain name returns a single hit: http://www.google.com/search?q=ultimatebizsource.biz+spam
That looks too little for 55,000 mails per day for one year.
Joe
Perhaps the question should be: do they have legitimate uses? Obviously their name, etc. sound very spammy, but is their subscriber list truly opt-in or is is harvested or scraped, etc.? If it's truly opt-in then they may have legitimate uses. Their site claims to be opt in, but of course that's impossible to confirm directly except perhaps by asking everyone on it.
However if it were not opt in, it would seem there should be many complaints. Also 55-58k is pretty small for a scraped or harvested list, which usually have more like millions. So perhaps there's a chance it actually is opt in.
The domain registration is from October 31, 2003. The domain registration for a related domain: Cashfromhome.com is quite a bit older: Creation Date: 08-jun-1998. These also lead me to believe they may have legitimate uses or at least that 1-8 years should have been enough time for SBL, NANAS, etc. to find them as true spammers.
(Note that there are 34 NANAS hits for the older domain, but all are from 1998 through 2000. None are newer, so perhaps they spammed somewhat several years ago but cleaned up their act in recent years. Most of the NANAS reports are apparently from the same person.)
Both domains are listed in WS:
/home/gorilla/black-gorilla-7_04.txt:cashfromhome.com /home/prolocation/black-prolocation-master:ultimatebizsource.biz
Chris, what evidence do you have? Same question for Raymond.
eh? Read their site! They don't particularly care who I am as long as I have money. They 'say' they have an opt in list. But if I give them money, they send my ad to their list. How could their members possibly have opt'd in to recieve my ads when they don't even know me yet?
cashfromhome? Hell they even list MLM right on their menu!
If you're going to remove these guys, then please let Ryan know to add to UC.
IN THEIR DEFENSE: their domain reg is from 1998 with no NANAS hits. HOWEVER, whose to say they send out their ad capmaigns using with links to that domain at all? Could be used as a front and they use other domains in their campaigns.
--Chris
On Friday, October 15, 2004, 7:25:28 AM, Chris Santerre wrote:
From: Jeff Chan [mailto:jeffc@surbl.org]
Both domains are listed in WS:
/home/gorilla/black-gorilla-7_04.txt:cashfromhome.com /home/prolocation/black-prolocation-master:ultimatebizsource.biz
Chris, what evidence do you have? Same question for Raymond.
eh? Read their site! They don't particularly care who I am as long as I have money. They 'say' they have an opt in list. But if I give them money, they send my ad to their list. How could their members possibly have opt'd in to recieve my ads when they don't even know me yet?
Opt-in doesn't mean they opted in because they know you. It could mean they opted in to get ads in general (for whatever reason).
By evidence I was referring to spams. If you have one, post it and how it got to you or at least a description of how it got to you.
Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."