-----Original Message----- From: Bret Miller [mailto:bret.miller@wcg.org] Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 1:45 PM To: rob@powerviewsystems.com; SURBL Discussion list Subject: RE: [SURBL-Discuss] Proposing a greylist
OK, OK... How about an "evilmulti" that included "unconfirmed", which would increase surbl's data size and processing-- having to build two multi lists, but would significantly reduce DNS query traffic since those using the "unconfirmed" list and the "multi" list could use a single query per URI instead of 2 per URI.
Bret
I say that can be determined after testing the list in general. But for now, mutli is no no. :)
Now, lets say for giggles Jeff says, "OK I agree to test this theory." Uh....how do we submit to it? Where is it? And who took my screwdrivers from my basement?
--Chris
Chris Santerre wrote to 'SURBL Discussion list':
I say that can be determined after testing the list in general. But for now, mutli is no no. :)
Now, lets say for giggles Jeff says, "OK I agree to test this theory." Uh....how do we submit to it? Where is it?
Well, if there isn't an obvious choice to "where", I'll officially volunteer to host this on our network, since I'm all for this. :-) We're already running rbldnsd, so it would be easy for me, and I have plenty of resources.
Submit domains to uc@sasknow.com ; I can give a small number of other testers and hand-checkers IMAP/webmail access as needed, and a web-based submit could be brought about in short order, if necessary.
Then, I'd just need a forward CNAME from uc.surbl.org to mail.sasknow.com.
And who took my screwdrivers from my basement?
Sorry. Had to hammer in a nail.
- Ryan
-
Chris Santerre -
Ryan Thompson