LOL. I'm adding them all to my post to Spam-L. Hopefully that will wake a fe of them up before we have to add them to the gray list!
--Chris
-----Original Message----- From: Matthew Wilson [mailto:matthew@boomer.com] Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 2:07 PM To: SURBL Discussion list Subject: [SURBL-Discuss] RE: open redirect at US CONGRESS
Oops; that site is not the US Congress..... Lol. Still, they're an open redirect.
-----Original Message----- From: Matthew Wilson Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 12:26 PM To: 'SURBL Discussion list' Subject: open redirect at US CONGRESS
http://www.congress.org/congressorg/webreturn/?url=http://www.surbl.org
Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.surbl.org http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Chris Santerre wrote:
LOL. I'm adding them all to my post to Spam-L. Hopefully that will wake a fe of them up before we have to add them to the gray list!
Chris...
Do you realize that you're giving out this info to spammers as well as spamfighters?
Shouldn't we just keep a low profile on this and possibly contact the admins of as many as possible and hope for them fixing?
Although it would be nice to have these in rbldns zone, sorry, but the havoc these inclusions would cause are not worth trouble.
Bayes, SA and SARE rules will take care of most cases without the need of driving eachother nuts.
Alex -- // Hands off BIG_SITE redirs //
-
Alex Broens -
Chris Santerre