-----Original Message----- From: Jeff Chan [mailto:jeffc@surbl.org] Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 10:41 PM To: SURBL Discuss Subject: [SURBL-Discuss] Pleaae beta test ds.surbl.org - 6dos data
Please beta test ds.surbl.org which is the 6dos data turned into a SURBL. In particular, please check the false positive rate and let us know what you find.
Please do not use ds.surbl.org for production mail servers as it is hosted only on my name server.
(Chris, the list has about 120,000 entries. Were there some .c files which we should exclude?)
"So, drop: Misc.c Registrars.c Mainsleaze.c and that oughta put a pretty big dent in complaints." - A friend. ;)
--Chris
From: Jeff Chan [mailto:jeffc@surbl.org] Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 10:41 PM
Please beta test ds.surbl.org which is the 6dos data turned into a SURBL. In particular, please check the false positive rate and let us know what you find.
Please do not use ds.surbl.org for production mail servers as it is hosted only on my name server.
(Chris, the list has about 120,000 entries. Were there some .c files which we should exclude?)
"So, drop: Misc.c Registrars.c Mainsleaze.c and that oughta put a pretty big dent in complaints." - A friend. ;)
Thanks Chris, Steve and friend. I've excluded those three files and the list is now about 87k entries.
The whitelist hits are now at 83:
http://spamcheck.freeapp.net/6dos.domains.whitelist-hits2
There appear to be quite a few spam domains in Misc.c, but that's apparently because those are pending classification. In that sense Misc.c is like a holding area.
Jeff C.
On Tuesday, June 29, 2004, 3:05:17 PM, Jeff Chan wrote:
I've excluded those three files and the list is now about 87k entries.
The whitelist hits are now at 83:
Folks, please test the revised ds.surbl.org list.
It may have lower spam detection and false positive rates now.
Jeff C.
-
Chris Santerre -
Jeff Chan