XBL actually, very strange, I will check and follow up regarding it.

/E. -----Original Message----- From: discuss-bounces@lists.surbl.org [mailto:discuss-bounces@lists.surbl.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Chan Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 11:34 PM To: SURBL Discussion list Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] SURBL Content

On Friday, May 6, 2005, 5:59:15 PM, Eric Smith wrote:

This morning we received a huge blast from a spammer that spamhaus.org identified properly but multi.surbl.org.rbldnsd didn't :( Just checking though :)

Eric

When you say spamhaus.org, which list are you referring to, XBL or SBL? Because one of the new lists we're experimenting with, xu.surbl.org, gets data from CBL spamtrap URI hits. CBL feeds into XBL, and some of the XBL senders probably end up in SBL also.

Next time you see one like this, if you check it using the SURBL checker:

http://www.rulesemporium.com/cgi-bin/uribl.cgi

it would be interesting to to hear if it hits the preliminary version of the XS data.

Cheers,

Jeff C. -- Don't harm innocent bystanders.

_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.surbl.org http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss