OK, I have a hunch it may be spam. It was submitted to SURBL and it pretty much looks like spam, But hard to tell. Anyone help me out?
http://www.ijting.com/index.asp?partner=dora
Chris Santerre System Admin and SARE/SURBL Ninja http://www.rulesemporium.com http://www.surbl.org 'It is not the strongest of the species that survives, not the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.' Charles Darwin
Hello,
I am testing a new Matcher class I developed for James that checks URIBLs. Seems to be working okay so far. This morning an email with a link to a popular Apple/Mac news site was blocked: thinksecret-MUNGED.com. It looks like it is listed in ws.surbl.org.
Is this a false positive, or is this domain really a spam source?
-Mike Bryant.
On Wednesday, December 29, 2004, 7:54:00 AM, Michael Bryant wrote:
I am testing a new Matcher class I developed for James that checks URIBLs. Seems to be working okay so far. This morning an email with a link to a popular Apple/Mac news site was blocked: thinksecret-MUNGED.com. It looks like it is listed in ws.surbl.org.
Is this a false positive, or is this domain really a spam source?
Thanks Mike. thinksecret .com seems to have legitimate uses of we've whitelisted it. Looks like the original source was Bill Stearns:
/home/wstearns/black-wstearns-black-string:thinksecret.com
Bill, can you tell us why it was listed?
Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."
On Wednesday, December 29, 2004, 3:09:22 PM, Jeff Chan wrote:
On Wednesday, December 29, 2004, 7:54:00 AM, Michael Bryant wrote:
I am testing a new Matcher class I developed for James that checks URIBLs. Seems to be working okay so far. This morning an email with a link to a popular Apple/Mac news site was blocked: thinksecret-MUNGED.com. It looks like it is listed in ws.surbl.org.
Is this a false positive, or is this domain really a spam source?
Thanks Mike. thinksecret .com seems to have legitimate uses of we've whitelisted it. Looks like the original source was Bill Stearns:
/home/wstearns/black-wstearns-black-string:thinksecret.com
Bill, can you tell us why it was listed?
By the way, a preferred address for reporting false positives is whitelist at surbl dot org.
BTW2, this is a 1999 domain with no SBL, RBL or NANAS.
Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."
On Wednesday, December 29, 2004, 7:14:31 AM, Chris Santerre wrote:
OK, I have a hunch it may be spam. It was submitted to SURBL and it pretty much looks like spam, But hard to tell. Anyone help me out?
It appears to be a Korean web site. Does anyone know anyone who can read Korean?
Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."
-
Chris Santerre -
Jeff Chan -
Michael Bryant