Guys, why is getty images dot com listed in SURBL? Or moz dev dot org?
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Steven Champeon wrote:
Guys, why is getty images dot com listed in SURBL? Or moz dev dot org?
I reported the FP on moz dev dot org yesterday to Jeff C, and he whitelisted it.
LER
-- hesketh.com/inc. v: +1(919)834-2552 f: +1(919)834-2554 w: http://hesketh.com Buy "Cascading Style Sheets: Separating Content from Presentation, 2/e" today! http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/159059231X/heskecominc-20/ref=nosim/ _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.surbl.org http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
On Tuesday, July 27, 2004, 7:16:10 AM, Steven Champeon wrote:
Guys, why is getty images dot com listed in SURBL? Or moz dev dot org?
We found moz.dev on ob.surbl.org yesterday and whitelisted it.
I've whitelisted gettyimages.com, but don't see it currently appearing on any SURBL. Maybe someone saw your report and removed it.
Please let us know what source list you are finding these on like ob, ws, sc, etc.
Jeff C.
on Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 02:32:00PM -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
On Tuesday, July 27, 2004, 7:16:10 AM, Steven Champeon wrote:
Guys, why is getty images dot com listed in SURBL? Or moz dev dot org?
We found moz.dev on ob.surbl.org yesterday and whitelisted it.
Thanks.
I've whitelisted gettyimages.com, but don't see it currently appearing on any SURBL. Maybe someone saw your report and removed it.
OK.
Please let us know what source list you are finding these on like ob, ws, sc, etc.
OK, I'll try - I'm using multi, so I'll have to look it up, though.
On Tuesday, July 27, 2004, 2:32:00 PM, Jeff Chan wrote:
On Tuesday, July 27, 2004, 7:16:10 AM, Steven Champeon wrote:
Guys, why is getty images dot com listed in SURBL? Or moz dev dot org?
We found moz.dev on ob.surbl.org yesterday and whitelisted it.
Er, make that mozdev.org...
Steve, your munging-with-spaces is a little confusing at times (like those times when there are no spaces in the original names, i.e. always ;-).
Jeff C.
on Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 02:48:55PM -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
On Tuesday, July 27, 2004, 2:32:00 PM, Jeff Chan wrote:
On Tuesday, July 27, 2004, 7:16:10 AM, Steven Champeon wrote:
Guys, why is getty images dot com listed in SURBL? Or moz dev dot org?
We found moz.dev on ob.surbl.org yesterday and whitelisted it.
Er, make that mozdev.org...
Steve, your munging-with-spaces is a little confusing at times (like those times when there are no spaces in the original names, i.e. always ;-).
Heh. OK, fair enough. I'll assume that your end is smart enough not to quarantine mail sent to the list :)
On Tuesday, July 27, 2004, 2:59:49 PM, Steven Champeon wrote:
on Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 02:48:55PM -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
On Tuesday, July 27, 2004, 2:32:00 PM, Jeff Chan wrote:
On Tuesday, July 27, 2004, 7:16:10 AM, Steven Champeon wrote:
Guys, why is getty images dot com listed in SURBL? Or moz dev dot org?
We found moz.dev on ob.surbl.org yesterday and whitelisted it.
Er, make that mozdev.org...
Steve, your munging-with-spaces is a little confusing at times (like those times when there are no spaces in the original names, i.e. always ;-).
Heh. OK, fair enough. I'll assume that your end is smart enough not to quarantine mail sent to the list :)
Munging is still a good idea to generally get mail across all systems, but the " dot " munging should be plenty to make a domain unparsable.
Jeff C.
-
Jeff Chan -
Larry Rosenman -
Steven Champeon