I thought we had a discussion on this already? The list I added has been in there for like 2 months. I went thru it. I do NOT use this guys list nilly willy. I haven't updated that file in 2 months. I only took his 100 recent changes, and went thru it and pulled a bunch out that were in question.
So the original file was looked thru by me and never changed. And only 80 or so were added out of the 100 latest updated. I probably won't look at this again for another 2 months as it takes a while to go thru them.
I don't add anything blindly. I don't want FPs either.
Why, is greatnow.com being listed a problem?
"Talk to me Goose!"
--Chris
-----Original Message----- From: Jeff Chan [mailto:jeffc@surbl.org] Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 1:39 PM To: Chris Santerre Cc: 'SURBL Discussion list' Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] free host: greatnow.com
On Friday, October 22, 2004, 7:21:56 AM, Chris Santerre wrote:
Thanks, I'll add his last 100 changes as well.
--Chris
-----Original Message----- From: Steven Champeon [mailto:schampeo@hesketh.com] Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 10:01 AM To: 'SURBL Discussion list' Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] free host: greatnow.com
Yep - confirmed. 'greatnow.com' is listed.
I really think we should discuss AND TEST adding new data sources before adding them to WS or any other list. There seem to be a lot of FPs in this blog list.
If we don't discuss and test these first, I may just remove them from WS.
Jeff C.
"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."
On Friday, October 22, 2004, 11:00:56 AM, Chris Santerre wrote:
I thought we had a discussion on this already? The list I added has been in there for like 2 months. I went thru it. I do NOT use this guys list nilly willy. I haven't updated that file in 2 months. I only took his 100 recent changes, and went thru it and pulled a bunch out that were in question.
So the original file was looked thru by me and never changed. And only 80 or so were added out of the 100 latest updated. I probably won't look at this again for another 2 months as it takes a while to go thru them.
I don't add anything blindly. I don't want FPs either.
Why, is greatnow.com being listed a problem?
Because it had a mention in a ham, which you got cc'ed on. It was about bluetooth code hosted at greatnow.com.
Here are some more possible FPs from that list, based on DMOZ hits (they're not all FPs, but some are):
http://spamcheck.freeapp.net/whitelists/check-ws-dmoz.txt
/home/gorilla/black-gorilla-9_7_04_SCblog.txt in nouse-white-jeffc-dmoz
125mb.com 15668.com 3host.com 51asa.com aesthetics.co.il americancdduplication.com aromacc.com atkins-diet-center.com bahraichfun.com bj-fyhj.com bjerwai.com bjgift.com bjxhjy.com blogspam.org carnalhost.com carnumbers.ru certificationking.net cheap-cigarettes.com cnbjflower.com cntoplead.com cyberfreehost.com cycatki.com da.ru danni.com deep-ice.com dieting-review.com digital-projector.net dns110.com donnemature.biz downloadzipcode.com drive-backup.com e-tutor.com easyrecorder.com emmss.com enacre.net esmartdesign.com everyvoice.net f2g.net fateback.com fda.com.cn flowertobj.com free-fast.net freeweb-hosting.com freewebpage.org friko.pl garment-china.com google8.net government-grants.org greatnow.com green-tx.com hentai-gratis.us hion.cn hit-logo-ringtone.com home.ro hostultra.com hs168.com huazhangmba.com imess.net incredishop.com intymnie.com iwebbroker.com kupibuket.ru lastminute-blitz.de lasvegasrealtor.com linseysworld.com livetreff.tv medcenterstore.com mengfuxiang.com motonet.pl multiservers.com my-age.net nasty-pages.com netfirms.com njunite.net owns1.com p5.org.uk paperscn.com partnersmanager.com penisimprovement.com penisresearch.com pimpspace.com pj-city.com reggaeboyzfanz.com republika.pl rittenhouse.ca royalfreehost.com sesso-gratis.cc sonnerie.net statusforsale.de svitonline.com sylviapanda.com t35.com testi-canzoni.com thewebbrains.com timescooter.com toshain.com undonet.com v27.net verycd.com webrank.cn wincmd.ru wizardsoul.com xaper.com xfreehosting.com yoll.net
Number of matches: 105
Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."
On Friday, October 22, 2004, 11:00:56 AM, Chris Santerre wrote:
I thought we had a discussion on this already? The list I added has been in there for like 2 months. I went thru it. I do NOT use this guys list nilly willy. I haven't updated that file in 2 months. I only took his 100 recent changes, and went thru it and pulled a bunch out that were in question.
This was the most recent discussion I could find. It doesn't seem to mention actually using the jayallen data in WS, though I might have missed a message:
From: Chris Santerre csanterre@MerchantsOverseas.com To: "'Jeff Chan'" jeffc@surbl.org, SATalk users@spamassassin.apache.org Cc: SURBL Discuss discuss@lists.surbl.org Subject: RE: Applying SURBL against blog comment spammers Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 09:36:29 -0400
Hell I'm feeling a little saucy this morning so lets mull this over. This goes against Jeff's thoughts. But if they are spamming, then just add them to SURBL. Does it matter if they spam email or blogs? To me, not really. Adding them to the regular SURBL is sure to cause them some pain.
Legit domains still get removed.
SO I say, go ahead and add them. However I would like to see an example of a spam'd blog. I've never seen one.
--Chris
and
From: Chris Santerre csanterre@merchantsoverseas.com To: "'jm@jmason.org'" jm@jmason.org, Matthew Hunter matthew@infodancer.org Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 13:55:25 -0400 Cc: SURBL Discuss discuss@lists.surbl.org Cc: SATalk users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: [SURBL-Discuss] RE: Applying SURBL against blog comment spammers
GREAT example J! One links to : http://patch.stanford.edu/MT/mt-comments.cgi?__mode=red&id=25 which links to : buy-cialis.ws
Which is NOT in SURBL!! (It will be today!) Because like Dr. Evil this is a pre-emptive Shhh! It is just a matter of time before this site is used in an email spam. I also see no difference between this blog spam and email spam. At all!
--Chris
Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."
-
Chris Santerre -
Jeff Chan