New subject: [Fwd: Re: First attempt to subvert surbl approach ? :)]

22 Apr 2004


      There's the problem - Sticking -munged doesn't help, since it just yanks 
the domain right out of the middle.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] First attempt to subvert surbl approach ? :)
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 17:58:44 -0700
From: Jeff Chan jeffc@surbl.org
To: discuss@lists.surbl.org
Spam detection software, running on the system "umlcoop", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or block
similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview:  On Wednesday, April 21, 2004, 5:30:37 PM, Simon Byrnand
   wrote: > Just browsing through my spam folder and noticed a spam with
   the following URL: >
   http://yahoo-MUNGED.com-EVEN-MORE.collectiza.com-munged/vp9 [...]
Content analysis details:   (8.8 points, 6.0 required)
pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- 
--------------------------------------------------
  0.8 RATWR9_MESSID          Message-ID has ratware pattern (9999.99999999@)
  3.0 WS_URI_RBL             URI's domain appears in spamcop database at 
ws.surbl.org
                             [yahoo-MUNGED.com-EVEN-MORE.collectiza.com is]
                             [blacklisted in SpamCop RBL at ws.surbl.org]
  5.0 SC_URI_RBL             URI's domain appears in spamcop database at 
sc.surbl.org
                             [yahoo-MUNGED.com-EVEN-MORE.collectiza.com is]
                             [blacklisted in SpamCop RBL at sc.surbl.org]

[Fwd: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] First attempt to subvert surbl approach ? :)]