-----Original Message----- From: Raymond Dijkxhoorn [mailto:raymond@prolocation.net] Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 9:39 AM To: SURBL Discussion list Subject: RE: [SURBL-Discuss] Improved name server status page
Hi!
Currently I have the DNS timeout set to 10 seconds with two retries. What kind of values are more typical or standard for resolvers?
I will use the scripts that generate the page to send notifications (probably to myself at first) once things stabilize. Since events don't happen very often, it's probably not necessary to show a history on the page.
That is very cool! However do you think it is wise to make
public the IP's
of the servers?
<BOFH mode=on>
No, indeed, lets hide them, it will only cause problems if we list them ;)
<BOFH mode=off>
Chris, you paranoid DONKEY :) how do you think people should lookup the zones if we dont publish where to get them. DNS does the exact same thing.
; <<>> DiG 9.2.1 <<>> ns surbl.org ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 21524 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 12, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 12
;; QUESTION SECTION: ;surbl.org. IN NS
;; ANSWER SECTION: surbl.org. 13466 IN NS ns9.surbl.org. surbl.org. 13466 IN NS ns8.surbl.org. surbl.org. 13466 IN NS ns7.surbl.org. surbl.org. 13466 IN NS ns6.surbl.org. surbl.org. 13466 IN NS ns5.surbl.org. surbl.org. 13466 IN NS ns3.surbl.org. surbl.org. 13466 IN NS ns2.surbl.org. surbl.org. 13466 IN NS ns13.surbl.org. surbl.org. 13466 IN NS ns12.surbl.org. surbl.org. 13466 IN NS ns11.surbl.org. surbl.org. 13466 IN NS ns10.surbl.org. surbl.org. 13466 IN NS ns1.surbl.org.
;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: ns9.surbl.org. 14175 IN A 209.234.97.11 ns8.surbl.org. 14175 IN A 66.59.111.182 ns7.surbl.org. 14175 IN A 130.161.128.84 ns6.surbl.org. 14175 IN A 128.255.17.20 ns5.surbl.org. 14175 IN A 128.255.17.19 ns3.surbl.org. 14175 IN A 139.130.4.5 ns2.surbl.org. 14175 IN A 209.204.159.15 ns13.surbl.org. 14175 IN A 66.170.2.60 ns12.surbl.org. 14175 IN A 66.170.2.50 ns11.surbl.org. 14175 IN A 64.21.208.212 ns10.surbl.org. 14175 IN A 66.251.133.4 ns1.surbl.org. 14175 IN A 208.201.249.238
LOL, yeah I realise that, but let the spammers do that. Why make it easy for them. Most can't spell DNS. :) The more hoops they have to go thru the better. I'm sure we may see a DDOS attempt by first quarter next year.
--Chris
On Tuesday, August 24, 2004, 6:48:33 AM, Chris Santerre wrote:
LOL, yeah I realise that, but let the spammers do that. Why make it easy for them. Most can't spell DNS. :) The more hoops they have to go thru the better. I'm sure we may see a DDOS attempt by first quarter next year.
If they're not DOSsing spamhaus' name servers they probably won't DOS ours. Spamhaus has a lot more enemies at this point.
Jeff C.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Chan" jeffc@surbl.org To: "'SURBL Discussion list'" discuss@lists.surbl.org Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 4:15 PM Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Improved name server status page
On Tuesday, August 24, 2004, 6:48:33 AM, Chris Santerre wrote:
LOL, yeah I realise that, but let the spammers do that. Why make it easy
for
them. Most can't spell DNS. :) The more hoops they have to go thru the better. I'm sure we may see a DDOS attempt by first quarter next year.
If they're not DOSsing spamhaus' name servers they probably won't DOS ours. Spamhaus has a lot more enemies at this point.
Wouldn't be so calm about it....... these "ppl" are paying some registrar for those "vanity" domain names... and want their money back and you know who is getting in their way...
Alex
-
Alex Broens -
Chris Santerre -
Jeff Chan