On Sunday, April 11, 2004, 12:29:43 AM, Daniel Quinlan wrote:

Also, it would be better from our perspective if we could get multiple RBL results from a single query to reduce overhead. Any of multiple A (like NJABL, SBL/XBL, or SORBS), bitmask A (like OPM or RBL+), or multiple TXT (like SBL/XBL) would probably not be too hard to support (Justin?).

Dooh, I think I just realized you were asking whether multiple RBLs could be supported from a single query inside SA, and not whether we could combine the lists on the RBL side. Pardon my misinterpretation if that was your original meaning.

Jeff C.