Hi Jeff,
again this one is only hosted on a few name servers now so please don't use it for production yet. We'd like your feedback about performance, false positives, etc.
Here are some stats from one of my test servers, gives you an idea of what success rate I am seeing from the various SURBL lists.
Hope the format doesn't munge too much :)
19/06/2004 2,439 messages 1,572 marked as spam
Description Total Ham % Spam % URL in ws.surbl.org 748 4 0.5 744 99.5 URL in ob.surbl.org 722 4 0.6 718 99.4 URL in sc.surbl.org 647 0 0 647 100 URL in ab.surbl.org 416 14 3.4 402 96.6 URL in be.surbl.org 48 1 2.1 47 97.9
20/06/2004 2,093 messages 1,352 marked as spam
Description Total Ham % Spam % URL in ob.surbl.org 777 31 4 746 96 URL in ws.surbl.org 731 5 0.7 726 99.3 URL in sc.surbl.org 528 0 0 528 100 URL in ab.surbl.org 404 2 0.5 402 99.5 URL in be.surbl.org 36 0 0 36 100
Regards,
Joseph
On Sunday, June 20, 2004, 6:23:30 PM, Joseph Burford wrote:
19/06/2004 2,439 messages 1,572 marked as spam
Description Total Ham % Spam % URL in ws.surbl.org 748 4 0.5 744 99.5 URL in ob.surbl.org 722 4 0.6 718 99.4 URL in sc.surbl.org 647 0 0 647 100 URL in ab.surbl.org 416 14 3.4 402 96.6 URL in be.surbl.org 48 1 2.1 47 97.9
20/06/2004 2,093 messages 1,352 marked as spam
Description Total Ham % Spam % URL in ob.surbl.org 777 31 4 746 96 URL in ws.surbl.org 731 5 0.7 726 99.3 URL in sc.surbl.org 528 0 0 528 100 URL in ab.surbl.org 404 2 0.5 402 99.5 URL in be.surbl.org 36 0 0 36 100
Thanks much for the data Joseph!
Does anyone else have any results to share, particularly spam rates and false positives of the beta lists ob.surbl.org and ab.surbl.org?
Jeff C.
-
Jeff Chan -
Joseph Burford