...

...

We've seen piles of spam promoting proflowers.com in the

past two days,

...

...

all containing asandox.com uris and arriving via an

asandox.com relay.

...

...

IMO asando.com

(http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL20781) is

...

the uri that should be blocked, not proflowers.com.

Thank you. That is exactly the right way to reason things. If asando_ is the actual spamming affiliate or whatever, then they should be the ones to block.

" It raises an interesting philosophical question; is the original company that paid for the compaign and benefits from the sales responsible? I don't claim to have an all-seeing answer, and would like to hear other people's opinions. Cheers, - Bill "

Stupid LookOut didn't quote your email :) Anyway.........

It depends on the company. I believe _some_ clearly know they are hiring a spammer on the grounds that they can deny knowing it. I believe this percentage is rising. There are a few who don't know they are hiring spammers. Trying to figure out which is which is tough. But in this particular case, the correct thing was done by not listing the flower company. Add then to a watch list. If they show up on radar again, launch the stinger!!

--Chris