...

adprofile.net reportedly appeared in a flowers.com ham as:

<td align="middle"><a href="http://tx.adprofile.net/tx/r?CID=12&M=3&sid=800ABC123"><IMG height=90 src="http://a1234.g.akamai.net/f/1233/1234/1a/www.1800flowers.com/800f_assets/images/flowers/images/banners/swift me too120X90.gif" width="120" NOSEND="1" border="0"></a></td>

Yet it's listed on WS by Bill Stearns. This may be a false positive. Does anyone have any more information about it?

Catherine Hampton says it's not on her spam radar and others have said that they may be web spammers on guestbooks, wikis, etc. but not email spammers. They seem to have some minor NANAS.

Feedback wanted. :-)

Jeff C.

Don't harm innocent bystanders.

---

Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.surbl.org http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Slime, but not an email spammer to my knowledge - They do redirect you (always) through portland.co. uk, who is slime also (and worse, but still not an email spammer as far as I know). BTW, they both will gladly sell your name, email address and IP (and probably whatever else they can collect).

Chris, if your reading this, you should now have two more "grey" entries for URIBL; But these both seem like FPs for SURBL.

Paul Shupak track@plectere.com

P.S. This is probaly the wrond list, but for those using URIBL, what scores are you using (mine are pretty low)? Reply on the URIBL list if it seems more appropriate (likely it is).