Some one from SURBL asked me (off list), what was that all about?

SUMMARY HERE: http://www.opinionjournal.com/best/ ..and here: http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/0,1518,317834,00.html

************ ************

CBS NEWS DOCS PROVEN A FORGERY...

Here: http://mysite.verizon.net/vze6vxcr/

..and here (very technical): http://www.flounder.com/bush2.htm

..and here: http://shapeofdays.typepad.com/the_shape_of_days/2004/09/the_ibm_selectr.htm l

..and here: http://www.ibmcomposer.org

..and here: http://www.powerlineblog.com

..and here: http://www.littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/

..and here: http://www.defeatjohnjohn.com/pageone.htm (offering reward to anyone who can produce this on 1973 equipment in a way that looks equally close as MS Word using default settings)

************ ************

BOTTOM LINE:

Don't trust Dan Rather and 60 Minutes (or even CBS News). In the face of overwhelming evidence, they are digging their heels in and still insist on their evidence being authentic!

(Interesting, PC Magazine weighed in with an opinion piece saying it was possibly authentic. But John Dvorak of PC Magazine commented 1st in the forum for this article saying to his fellow journalist, "nice try, but this is a forgery." (I paraphrase). Also, the PC Magazine effort was thoroughly debunked. For example, PC Mag's typewriter example had foot marks instead of apostrophes.)

Rob McEwen