See:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4249 http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3997
It would be interesting to see if folks could try the patches added to the tickets, try a slow DNS resolution (longer than the timeout of 3 seconds) and see if they can duplicate/eliminate the error. Also if the hypothesis on 4249 is correct, then the problem of mixed up UDP packets may show up on a network analyzer, tcpdump, etc.
Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."
Jeff Chan wrote:
See:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4249 http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3997
patch applied, will report any findings.
It is a shame, false positives from the code (rather than the data) may have reduced the scoring for URIDNSBL rules.
Rob
-
Jeff Chan -
Robert Brooks