-----Original Message----- From: Jeff Chan [mailto:jeffc@surbl.org] Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 7:33 AM To: SURBL Discuss Subject: [SURBL-Discuss] RFC: Public false positve reporting form

How does anyone feel about a public false positive reporting form? Such a form would include the reporting party, the domain(s) or IPs, reasons why it's a false positive, etc.

I think the public needs a way to report FP, to be listed, and greylist domains. However, only if more then one person can work on these. ;)

It could be processed publically or privately in a bug tracking system. It would be hand checked by some of our experienced spam fighters. The results could be published or simply aggregated without public announcement into the overall whitelist.

Is this a good or bad idea?

good

What level of publication should there be?

Answers to none. They give, we take info. Too time consuming to answer all.

What forms of proof (if any) does anyone like?

spam with headers. The rest is up to us.

Other comments?

Who was the first nut ever to think up pole vaulting?

"Hey Jim, see that there bush? I bet if I run fast enough with this here flagpole......."

--Chris