Publishers Clearing House wrote:
Spam detection software, running on the system "lerami.lerctr.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see ler@lerctr.org for details.
Content preview: Someone with the intials L R must be declared... Lawrence Rosenman L R Lawrence Rosenman: [...]
Content analysis details: (7.4 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
1.7 SARE_OEM_FAKE_YEAR BODY: SARE_OEM_FAKE_YEAR 1.6 UNCLAIMED_MONEY BODY: People just leave money laying around 0.7 SARE_MONEYTERMS BODY: Talks about money in some way. 0.1 HTML_80_90 BODY: Message is 80% to 90% HTML 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] 0.1 HTML_FONT_BIG BODY: HTML tag for a big font size 0.2 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts 3.0 URIBL_WS_SURBL Contains a URL listed in the WS SURBL blocklist [URIs: pch.com]
The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus, or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.
Why is PCH.COM on WS?
They are (semi-)legit.
LER
On Thursday, August 19, 2004, 5:26:59 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
Why is PCH.COM on WS?
They are (semi-)legit.
LER
Yes, I'm whitelisting:
pch.com pchmail.com
They have legitimate uses.
WS folks please remove them.
Jeff C.