Does anyone know anybody at antiphishing.org? It might be nice if we could get them to publish their phishing data as a SURBL or add it to PH.
Jeff C.
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 17:22:16 -0700, Jeff Chan jeffc@surbl.org wrote:
Does anyone know anybody at antiphishing.org? It might be nice if we could get them to publish their phishing data as a SURBL or add it to PH.
Hi Jeff,
We were using the data from their website for a while, however it became too labour intensive. I also sent a request for a data feed, but recieved no response.
Another great site with good data is www.millersmiles.co.uk he was happy to provide us with a data feed, however never got around to doing so!
On Wednesday, September 8, 2004, 5:30:25 PM, David Hooton wrote:
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 17:22:16 -0700, Jeff Chan jeffc@surbl.org wrote:
Does anyone know anybody at antiphishing.org? It might be nice if we could get them to publish their phishing data as a SURBL or add it to PH.
Hi Jeff,
We were using the data from their website for a while, however it became too labour intensive. I also sent a request for a data feed, but recieved no response.
Another great site with good data is www.millersmiles.co.uk he was happy to provide us with a data feed, however never got around to doing so!
Do you have a feeling about the accuracy of the data from either?
Are they worthy of a direct feed, for example combined into PH?
Jeff C.
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 17:39:39 -0700, Jeff Chan jeffc@surbl.org wrote:
Do you have a feeling about the accuracy of the data from either?
Are they worthy of a direct feed, for example combined into PH?
It is good data, some of it is somewhat delayed but it's still good. I'm happy to combine it into PH provided we can get an appropriate feed of domains/IP's
On Wednesday, September 8, 2004, 8:12:10 PM, David Hooton wrote:
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 17:39:39 -0700, Jeff Chan jeffc@surbl.org wrote:
Do you have a feeling about the accuracy of the data from either?
Are they worthy of a direct feed, for example combined into PH?
It is good data, some of it is somewhat delayed but it's still good. I'm happy to combine it into PH provided we can get an appropriate feed of domains/IP's
Thanks for the feedback. :-)
If we can get a feed from them, I was thinking about merging it here, but it might be better if you guys could check them and merge on your side since you're familiar with the phishing area.
Let's see if I can get either of them to respond.
Jeff C.
On Thursday, September 9, 2004, 1:38:03 PM, Frank Ellermann wrote:
Jeff Chan wrote:
Let's see if I can get either of them to respond.
Please say so if you get an answer from antiphishing.org
At the moment my impression is that it's some kind of Dave Null - but with a working vacation auto-responder.
Bye, Frank
Yes, we would definitely announce if we got them. However if anyone knows any personal contacts for us at antiphishing.org or millersmiles.co.uk, please let me know. I'm not sure if my messages to their role accounts/public addresses will get through.
BTW, I hope everyone here is subscribed to the SURBL announce list, since that's where important announcements are posted:
http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/announce
Jeff C.