I hope folks going to the MIT spam conference will please consider mentioning SURBLs at least informally. In case it's useful, I've updated the flyer I gave out at CEAS:
http://www.surbl.org/flyer.html
Comments are welcomed.
Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."
Happy new year, folks,
Jeff Chan wrote:
I hope folks going to the MIT spam conference will please consider mentioning SURBLs at least informally. In case it's useful, I've updated the flyer I gave out at CEAS:
http://www.surbl.org/flyer.html
Comments are welcomed.
You forgot to mention j-chkmail, which supports surbl since april 2004, probably the oldest one, other than SpamAssassin.
Joe
Jeff C.
"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."
On Wednesday, January 5, 2005, 3:10:49 AM, Jose Cruz wrote:
Happy new year, folks,
Jeff Chan wrote:
I hope folks going to the MIT spam conference will please consider mentioning SURBLs at least informally. In case it's useful, I've updated the flyer I gave out at CEAS:
http://www.surbl.org/flyer.html
Comments are welcomed.
You forgot to mention j-chkmail, which supports surbl since april 2004, probably the oldest one, other than SpamAssassin.
Joe
It's implicit as part of sendmail support.
Jeff C.