On Saturday, July 12, 2008, 7:00:29 PM, Joseph Brennan wrote:
--On Saturday, July 12, 2008 1:41 AM -0700 Jeff Chan jeffc@surbl.org wrote:
We can probably significantly reduce the false positives on ob.surbl.org, the SURBL list based on Outblaze's URI blacklist:
http://www.surbl.org/lists.html#ob
at the cost of some possibly minor false negatives.
[...]
Should we make that change?
This agrees with our experience using SURBL for a few years. We've seen the occasional fp with the ob listings, and none I am aware of with the rest of SURBL.
What's the change?
Thanks much for the feedback Daryl and Joseph! I think we probably can't reveal the exact listing criteria in case they're useful for the bad guys. I know it's somewhat inappropriate to ask for comments without revealing details. I suppose I'm asking for general responses then. :)
Jeff C.
Jeff Chan jeffc@surbl.org wrote:
I think we probably can't reveal the exact listing criteria in case they're useful for the bad guys. I know it's somewhat inappropriate to ask for comments without revealing details. I suppose I'm asking for general responses then. :)
So you'll keep ob, but take some undisclosed action to improve its accuracy. Sounds worthwhile to me.
Joseph Brennan Lead Email Systems Engineer Columbia University Information Technology