Just curious is brightmail or ironport IPs are rsyncing surbl data? Anyone
know?
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SARE Ninja
http://www.rulesemporium.comhttp://www.surbl.org
'It is not the strongest of the species that survives,
not the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.'
Charles Darwin
I noticed mailscanner dot info is in ws.surbl.org and I believe this to
be incorrect. Do we have an alternate more automated way of dealing w/
false positives?
Best Regards,
Lindsay
Hi Raymond,
3 different systems (2 RH9 and 1 Fedora Core 1)
Perl 5.8.0 on the RH9 boxes
Perl 5.8.3 on the FC1 box
URI is 1.31
SpamCopURI is 0.18
I initially followed instructions at
http://www.fsl.com/support/index.html, using the latest URI.
I had to install LWP::UserAgent, on my RH9 boxes it went well, but on my
FC1 box it returns:
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
live/…
[View More]apache-listing.t 8 1 12.50% 5
Failed 1/41 test scripts, 97.56% okay. 1/761 subtests failed, 99.87%
okay.
make: *** [test] Error 255
/usr/bin/make test -- NOT OK
Running make install
make test had returned bad status, won't install without force
Thanks
Guy
-----Original Message-----
What version perl are you using? What OS?
Whats the version of URI?
[View Less]
>From the install thru CPAN
t/blacklist........ok
t/dnsrbl...........ok
t/extract_urls.....ok
t/mailto...........ok
t/open_redirect....NOK 1# Failed test (t/open_redirect.t at line 37)
t/open_redirect....NOK 2# Failed test (t/open_redirect.t at line 44)
# Failed test (t/open_redirect.t at line 52)
t/open_redirect....ok 5/5# Looks like you failed 3 tests of 5.
t/open_redirect....dubious
Test returned status 3 (wstat 768, 0x300)
DIED. FAILED tests 1-3
Failed 3/5 …
[View More]tests, 40.00% okay
t/spamcopuri.......ok
t/whitelist........ok
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
t/open_redirect.t 3 768 5 3 60.00% 1-3
Failed 1/7 test scripts, 85.71% okay. 3/57 subtests failed, 94.74% okay.
make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 29
/usr/bin/make test -- NOT OK
Running make install
make test had returned bad status, won't install without force
-----Original Message-----
From: discuss-bounces(a)lists.surbl.org
[mailto:discuss-bounces@lists.surbl.org] On Behalf Of Raymond Dijkxhoorn
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 08:04
To: SURBL Discussion list
Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss]
Hi!
> t/open_redirect....NOK 2# Failed test (t/open_redirect.t at line
44)
> t/open_redirect....NOK 3# Failed test (t/open_redirect.t at line
52)
> t/open_redirect....ok 5/5# Looks like you failed 3 tests of 5.
> t/open_redirect....dubious
> Test returned status 3 (wstat 768, 0x300)
> DIED. FAILED tests 1-3
> Failed 3/5 tests, 40.00% okay
> t/spamcopuri.......ok
> t/whitelist........ok
> Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------
> t/open_redirect.t 3 768 5 3 60.00% 1-3
> Failed 1/7 test scripts, 85.71% okay. 3/57 subtests failed, 94.74%
okay.
> make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 29
Did you try to install via CPAN ? So it can try to get the dependencies
?
perl -MCPAN -e shell
install Mail::SpamAssassin::SpamCopURI
Bye,
Raymond.
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss(a)lists.surbl.org
http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
[View Less]
2
1
by Mailing List
13 Jul '04
13 Jul '04
Got this output from the make test
t/blacklist........ok
t/dnsrbl...........ok
t/extract_urls.....ok
t/mailto...........ok
t/open_redirect....NOK 1# Failed test (t/open_redirect.t at line 37)
t/open_redirect....NOK 2# Failed test (t/open_redirect.t at line 44)
t/open_redirect....NOK 3# Failed test (t/open_redirect.t at line 52)
t/open_redirect....ok 5/5# Looks like you failed 3 tests of 5.
t/open_redirect....dubious
Test returned status 3 (wstat 768, 0x300)
DIED. FAILED …
[View More]tests 1-3
Failed 3/5 tests, 40.00% okay
t/spamcopuri.......ok
t/whitelist........ok
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
t/open_redirect.t 3 768 5 3 60.00% 1-3
Failed 1/7 test scripts, 85.71% okay. 3/57 subtests failed, 94.74% okay.
make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 29
Any pointers ?
Kindest Regards
[View Less]
As discussed on a nother list. These edu.tw are notorious for not being
secure and open proxies. However that isn't what we list. SO I'm suggesting
edu.tw domains get added to whitelist.
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SARE Ninja
http://www.rulesemporium.comhttp://www.surbl.org
'It is not the strongest of the species that survives,
not the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.'
Charles Darwin
Just wanted to let you guys know that MSU is using surbl.org.
We rock ;)
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SARE Ninja
http://www.rulesemporium.comhttp://www.surbl.org
'It is not the strongest of the species that survives,
not the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.'
Charles Darwin
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Nicolas Riendeau [mailto:knightr@istop.com]
>Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2004 8:10 PM
>To: William Stearns; SURBL Discussion list
>Subject: [SURBL-Discuss] Re: Using (SU)RBL with a browser, any
>way to do
>it? (was <snip> )
>
>
>> Good morning, Nicolas,
>
>Hi William!
>
>> What's the problem with using a proxy? I have instructions at
>> http://www.stearns.org/sa-blacklist/ on how to use the
>sa-…
[View More]blacklist (the
>> data underlying ws.surbl.org) in both squid and privoxy, using those
>> proxies to block web access to the spammer web sites.
>> Squid, at least, is available on both unix and windows (see
>> http://www.cygwin.com).
>
>Thanks, I didn't know that...
>
>The fact that it works on Windows would take care of one of
>the problems as the
>number of *nix admins where I work is somewhat limited
>compared to the number of
>Windows admins...
>
>Only problem left now would be to convince them to invest in
>the necessary hardware...
>
>> If you use a different proxy, I'd be glad to work with you to
>> provide the sa-blacklist in a form suitable for that proxy.
>> Cheers,
>> - Bill
>
>Thanks!
>
>Nick
>
Or one could take the sa-blacklist file and turn it into a quick hosts file.
I have a host file on the server that is copied to everyones machine
everytime they log in. Full of spyware domains that simply point to
127.0.0.1 and It is easy for me to change.
However squid also rocks. I have had a test server running for 1.5 years. I
haven't had time to tweak it yet to go production yet.
--Chris
[View Less]
Good grief I have been going thru the domains submitted into SURBL and came
up with a nasty kiddie pron site. Anyone here have contact with Secret
Service or anyone else for that matter? I don't want the site just shutdown,
I want these guys caught.
*Warning, very disturbing site!*
haydn.e-pid.org
Address: 61.128.198.123 resolved to haydn.e-pid.org
AS: 61.128.128.0/17 AS4134 [CN] Data Communications Bureau Beijing
Net 61.128.128-255 CHINANET-CQ [CN] @ns.chinanet.cn.net
--Chris
>-----Original Message-----
>From: William Stearns [mailto:wstearns@pobox.com]
>Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 11:18 AM
>To: SURBL Discussion list
>Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] msu.edu hell yeah!
>
>
>Good morning, Chris,
>
>On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Chris Santerre wrote:
>
>> Just wanted to let you guys know that MSU is using surbl.org.
>
> With Spamassassin, or with some other MTA/software combination?
>
>> We rock ;)
>
> I personally …
[View More]pebble, on a good day. :-)
> Cheers,
> - Bill
:)
With SA.
--Chris
[View Less]