Discuss

discuss@lists.surbl.org

1867 discussions

Re: SpamAssassin Logo Update
by Jeff Chan 14 Aug '04

14 Aug '04

FWIW I agree with most of your own comments. The arrow is much more meaningful in cross-cultural symbolism than the shuriken. (Even many Japanese people would probably more readily recognize the arrow than the Shuriken, which is an obscure and impractical weapon at best.) The tie in with Apache is an added plus. I like the top (closest to original?) logo the best. I find your logo clean, professional, meaningful and, frankly, pretty. Those are hard to come by. Congratulations on nice work. Jeff C.

1 0

fp: straight dope dot com
by Steven Champeon 13 Aug '04

13 Aug '04

Why is this domain listed? I know the jokeaday folks are scum, but heck, I subscribe to the straight dope list. -- hesketh.com/inc. v: +1(919)834-2552 f: +1(919)834-2554 w: http://hesketh.com Buy "Cascading Style Sheets: Separating Content from Presentation, 2/e" today! http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/159059231X/heskecominc-20/ref=nosim/

3 4

URL spam using google search
by Yusuf Goolamabbas 13 Aug '04

13 Aug '04

Not sure if this was ever discussed on this list. >Ksd DSCg RAZIfdY pi pzwoKCB > > >Smokers Club... > > >Check links bellow and you will find the sites offering fresh cigarettes: >MARLBORO 12,40 per carton >CAMEL 11,80 per carton >WINSTON 10,45 per carton >and much more, with guaranteed US delivery! > >Avoid wasting money! Just use one of the following >links (WHICHEVER YOUR PREFER) > > ><http://www.google.com/search?q=unbelievably+cheap+… [View More]

3 3

Possible fps
by Jeff Chan 13 Aug '04

13 Aug '04

Here is a list of 130 domains that come from messages have been manually marked as "not spam" at a large but deliberately unnamed mail provider. We may want to consider whitelisting these. Here's a summary of matches against the lists, with some overlap: list count: 130 ws: 77 ob: 54 ab: 2 ph: 4 sc: 0 activismispatriotism.org anwod.com anyxhost.com appleseedsacks.com aramova.com asexstoryforyou.com asianangels.com autumntiger.com b33r.us … [View More]

6 14

Zone data
by Ryan Thompson 12 Aug '04

12 Aug '04

Hi all, I decided it was finally high time to fill out the rsync access form, so I did that yesterday. (By the way, Jeff, I think I forgot to click the "If we may publish..." checkbox. You can pretend I did. ;-) Until I get the access information, is there a perhaps less current source I could do a one-time download from to better test my rbldnsd installation? My Googling was hopeless. - Ryan, the Occasionally Impatient -- Ryan Thompson <ryan(a)sasknow.com> SaskNow Technologies … [View More]

2 3

RE: [SURBL-Discuss] RE: (1) Another Possible FP, and (2) header p arsing issues
by Chris Santerre 12 Aug '04

12 Aug '04

>-----Original Message----- >From: Rob McEwen [mailto:rob@pvsys.com] >Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 12:17 PM >To: 'Chris Santerre'; 'SURBL Discussion list' >Subject: RE: [SURBL-Discuss] RE: (1) Another Possible FP, and >(2) header >parsing issues >Importance: High > > >Chris said: > >>I'm confused. (Theres a first!) SURBL only >>check the body for URLs. How did the message-ID get hit? > >Its simply an issue where someone's implementation … [View More]

2 1

[SURBL-Discuss] RE: (1) Another Possible FP, and (2) header parsing issues
by Rob McEwen 12 Aug '04

12 Aug '04

I have a two-part question: (1) header parsing issues... I was reading a web site discussing an implementation of SURBL on the IceWarp web server (using a third party add-on). One person complained that there are too many false positives when submitting IPs and domains found in the header of the e-mail. They felt like ONLY the body of the message should be examined. I see good arguments both ways. For example, parsing the header can catch spam which was originally sent to one place, but then … [View More]

2 1

fp whitelisted: callatg.com, others
by Jeff Chan 12 Aug '04

12 Aug '04

I've whitelisted: atgi.net callatg.com advancedtelcom.com All of which belong to the same legitimate company. They make telephone switch hardware, etc. and I knew someone who worked there. callatg.com was on ws. Bill can you see how it got on? Jeff C.

1 0

Re: Message Not Getting to the SURBL List
by Jeff Chan 12 Aug '04

12 Aug '04

On Thursday, August 12, 2004, 7:27:06 AM, Rob McEwen wrote: > Jeff, > The enclosed message is not getting to the list (See attached). If this is > due to a normal delay, please disregard this message. > Thanks, > Rob McEwen I can't see your message getting out. Maybe I can ask you to gateway this back to them: SURBLs should be used on message body URIs, not message headers. Though I can see some of the reasons for wanting to try on headers, they're really meant for … [View More]

1 0

RE: [SURBL-Discuss] Possible fps
by Chris Santerre 12 Aug '04

12 Aug '04

>-----Original Message----- >From: William Stearns [mailto:wstearns@pobox.com] >Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 10:54 AM >To: SURBL Discussion list >Cc: 'Jeff Chan'; Chris Santerre; William Stearns >Subject: RE: [SURBL-Discuss] Possible fps > > >Good morning, Chris, > >On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Chris Santerre wrote: > >> I would like to hand check these. We should split the list >up. I volunteer >> to check A-H on the list. I'll check them this … [View More]

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss