Fixed just now. I've informed the person who submitted it. I couldn't find
anything bad on them. But sometimes this submitter does. I've whitelisted
them.
--Chris
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Lindsay Snider [mailto:lindsay@pa.net]
>Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 10:58 AM
>To: discuss(a)lists.surbl.org
>Subject: [SURBL-Discuss] fp mailscanner dot info
>
>
>I noticed mailscanner dot info is in ws.surbl.org and I believe this to
>be incorrect. Do we have an …
[View More]alternate more automated way of dealing w/
>false positives?
>
>Best Regards,
>Lindsay
>_______________________________________________
>Discuss mailing list
>Discuss(a)lists.surbl.org
>http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
[View Less]
"
Symantec's patent-pending URL Filters technology leverages key
infrastructure elements unique to Symantec. Using its real-time
spam data, the BLOC builds a list of spammer's Web sites. At the
customer site, URL Filters compare embedded links in messages
to the list of spam URLs maintained by the BLOC.
The list itself is created by using a combination of offline and real-time
processes, incorporating URLs fromthe following sources:
Probe Network data. The majority of the spam URLs are …
[View More]extracted from
incoming spam and historical data from the Probe Network. Thus, if there are
URLs present in the message, and the BLOC has ruled against the message, the
URL is added to the list.
Trusted third party lists. URL lists maintained by third party vendors and
partners are verified, cross-checked, and incorporated into Symantec's spam
URL list.
"
Patent Pending? Third Party? Hmmm........
I have a problem with people making money off open source. I have a REAL
problem when people don't even mention the source. I'm not saying they do
use surbl.org, but if they did, they should say it.
They also say that URL filtering is exclusive to brightmail. Nice!
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SARE Ninja
http://www.rulesemporium.comhttp://www.surbl.org
'It is not the strongest of the species that survives,
not the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.'
Charles Darwin
[View Less]
Just curious is brightmail or ironport IPs are rsyncing surbl data? Anyone
know?
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SARE Ninja
http://www.rulesemporium.comhttp://www.surbl.org
'It is not the strongest of the species that survives,
not the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.'
Charles Darwin
I noticed mailscanner dot info is in ws.surbl.org and I believe this to
be incorrect. Do we have an alternate more automated way of dealing w/
false positives?
Best Regards,
Lindsay
Hi Raymond,
3 different systems (2 RH9 and 1 Fedora Core 1)
Perl 5.8.0 on the RH9 boxes
Perl 5.8.3 on the FC1 box
URI is 1.31
SpamCopURI is 0.18
I initially followed instructions at
http://www.fsl.com/support/index.html, using the latest URI.
I had to install LWP::UserAgent, on my RH9 boxes it went well, but on my
FC1 box it returns:
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
live/…
[View More]apache-listing.t 8 1 12.50% 5
Failed 1/41 test scripts, 97.56% okay. 1/761 subtests failed, 99.87%
okay.
make: *** [test] Error 255
/usr/bin/make test -- NOT OK
Running make install
make test had returned bad status, won't install without force
Thanks
Guy
-----Original Message-----
What version perl are you using? What OS?
Whats the version of URI?
[View Less]
>From the install thru CPAN
t/blacklist........ok
t/dnsrbl...........ok
t/extract_urls.....ok
t/mailto...........ok
t/open_redirect....NOK 1# Failed test (t/open_redirect.t at line 37)
t/open_redirect....NOK 2# Failed test (t/open_redirect.t at line 44)
# Failed test (t/open_redirect.t at line 52)
t/open_redirect....ok 5/5# Looks like you failed 3 tests of 5.
t/open_redirect....dubious
Test returned status 3 (wstat 768, 0x300)
DIED. FAILED tests 1-3
Failed 3/5 …
[View More]tests, 40.00% okay
t/spamcopuri.......ok
t/whitelist........ok
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
t/open_redirect.t 3 768 5 3 60.00% 1-3
Failed 1/7 test scripts, 85.71% okay. 3/57 subtests failed, 94.74% okay.
make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 29
/usr/bin/make test -- NOT OK
Running make install
make test had returned bad status, won't install without force
-----Original Message-----
From: discuss-bounces(a)lists.surbl.org
[mailto:discuss-bounces@lists.surbl.org] On Behalf Of Raymond Dijkxhoorn
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 08:04
To: SURBL Discussion list
Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss]
Hi!
> t/open_redirect....NOK 2# Failed test (t/open_redirect.t at line
44)
> t/open_redirect....NOK 3# Failed test (t/open_redirect.t at line
52)
> t/open_redirect....ok 5/5# Looks like you failed 3 tests of 5.
> t/open_redirect....dubious
> Test returned status 3 (wstat 768, 0x300)
> DIED. FAILED tests 1-3
> Failed 3/5 tests, 40.00% okay
> t/spamcopuri.......ok
> t/whitelist........ok
> Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------
> t/open_redirect.t 3 768 5 3 60.00% 1-3
> Failed 1/7 test scripts, 85.71% okay. 3/57 subtests failed, 94.74%
okay.
> make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 29
Did you try to install via CPAN ? So it can try to get the dependencies
?
perl -MCPAN -e shell
install Mail::SpamAssassin::SpamCopURI
Bye,
Raymond.
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss(a)lists.surbl.org
http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
[View Less]
2
1
by Mailing List
13 Jul '04
13 Jul '04
Got this output from the make test
t/blacklist........ok
t/dnsrbl...........ok
t/extract_urls.....ok
t/mailto...........ok
t/open_redirect....NOK 1# Failed test (t/open_redirect.t at line 37)
t/open_redirect....NOK 2# Failed test (t/open_redirect.t at line 44)
t/open_redirect....NOK 3# Failed test (t/open_redirect.t at line 52)
t/open_redirect....ok 5/5# Looks like you failed 3 tests of 5.
t/open_redirect....dubious
Test returned status 3 (wstat 768, 0x300)
DIED. FAILED …
[View More]tests 1-3
Failed 3/5 tests, 40.00% okay
t/spamcopuri.......ok
t/whitelist........ok
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
t/open_redirect.t 3 768 5 3 60.00% 1-3
Failed 1/7 test scripts, 85.71% okay. 3/57 subtests failed, 94.74% okay.
make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 29
Any pointers ?
Kindest Regards
[View Less]
As discussed on a nother list. These edu.tw are notorious for not being
secure and open proxies. However that isn't what we list. SO I'm suggesting
edu.tw domains get added to whitelist.
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SARE Ninja
http://www.rulesemporium.comhttp://www.surbl.org
'It is not the strongest of the species that survives,
not the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.'
Charles Darwin
Just wanted to let you guys know that MSU is using surbl.org.
We rock ;)
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SARE Ninja
http://www.rulesemporium.comhttp://www.surbl.org
'It is not the strongest of the species that survives,
not the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.'
Charles Darwin