Discuss

discuss@lists.surbl.org

1 participants
1867 discussions

RE: [SURBL-Discuss] fp mailscanner dot info
by Chris Santerre 14 Jul '04

14 Jul '04

Fixed just now. I've informed the person who submitted it. I couldn't find anything bad on them. But sometimes this submitter does. I've whitelisted them. --Chris >-----Original Message----- >From: Lindsay Snider [mailto:lindsay@pa.net] >Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 10:58 AM >To: discuss(a)lists.surbl.org >Subject: [SURBL-Discuss] fp mailscanner dot info > > >I noticed mailscanner dot info is in ws.surbl.org and I believe this to >be incorrect. Do we have an alternate more automated way of dealing w/ >false positives? > >Best Regards, >Lindsay >_______________________________________________ >Discuss mailing list >Discuss(a)lists.surbl.org >http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >

3 2

beam.to redirect service, listed in ws.
by Patrik Nilsson 13 Jul '04

13 Jul '04

Should beam.to be whitelisted? It's a redirect service. Currently listed in ws. Patrik

2 1

WHy did I ask about brightmail?
by Chris Santerre 13 Jul '04

13 Jul '04

" Symantec's patent-pending URL Filters technology leverages key infrastructure elements unique to Symantec. Using its real-time spam data, the BLOC builds a list of spammer's Web sites. At the customer site, URL Filters compare embedded links in messages to the list of spam URLs maintained by the BLOC. The list itself is created by using a combination of offline and real-time processes, incorporating URLs fromthe following sources: Probe Network data. The majority of the spam URLs are extracted from incoming spam and historical data from the Probe Network. Thus, if there are URLs present in the message, and the BLOC has ruled against the message, the URL is added to the list. Trusted third party lists. URL lists maintained by third party vendors and partners are verified, cross-checked, and incorporated into Symantec's spam URL list. " Patent Pending? Third Party? Hmmm........ I have a problem with people making money off open source. I have a REAL problem when people don't even mention the source. I'm not saying they do use surbl.org, but if they did, they should say it. They also say that URL filtering is exclusive to brightmail. Nice! Chris Santerre System Admin and SARE Ninja http://www.rulesemporium.com http://www.surbl.org 'It is not the strongest of the species that survives, not the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.' Charles Darwin

2 1

rsync and brightmail
by Chris Santerre 13 Jul '04

13 Jul '04

Just curious is brightmail or ironport IPs are rsyncing surbl data? Anyone know? Chris Santerre System Admin and SARE Ninja http://www.rulesemporium.com http://www.surbl.org 'It is not the strongest of the species that survives, not the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.' Charles Darwin

1 0

fp mailscanner dot info
by Lindsay Snider 13 Jul '04

13 Jul '04

I noticed mailscanner dot info is in ws.surbl.org and I believe this to be incorrect. Do we have an alternate more automated way of dealing w/ false positives? Best Regards, Lindsay

1 0

RE: [SURBL-Discuss]
by Mailing List 13 Jul '04

13 Jul '04

Hi Raymond, 3 different systems (2 RH9 and 1 Fedora Core 1) Perl 5.8.0 on the RH9 boxes Perl 5.8.3 on the FC1 box URI is 1.31 SpamCopURI is 0.18 I initially followed instructions at http://www.fsl.com/support/index.html, using the latest URI. I had to install LWP::UserAgent, on my RH9 boxes it went well, but on my FC1 box it returns: Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------- live/apache-listing.t 8 1 12.50% 5 Failed 1/41 test scripts, 97.56% okay. 1/761 subtests failed, 99.87% okay. make: *** [test] Error 255 /usr/bin/make test -- NOT OK Running make install make test had returned bad status, won't install without force Thanks Guy -----Original Message----- What version perl are you using? What OS? Whats the version of URI?

1 0

RE: [SURBL-Discuss]
by Mailing List 13 Jul '04

13 Jul '04

>From the install thru CPAN t/blacklist........ok t/dnsrbl...........ok t/extract_urls.....ok t/mailto...........ok t/open_redirect....NOK 1# Failed test (t/open_redirect.t at line 37) t/open_redirect....NOK 2# Failed test (t/open_redirect.t at line 44) # Failed test (t/open_redirect.t at line 52) t/open_redirect....ok 5/5# Looks like you failed 3 tests of 5. t/open_redirect....dubious Test returned status 3 (wstat 768, 0x300) DIED. FAILED tests 1-3 Failed 3/5 tests, 40.00% okay t/spamcopuri.......ok t/whitelist........ok Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------- t/open_redirect.t 3 768 5 3 60.00% 1-3 Failed 1/7 test scripts, 85.71% okay. 3/57 subtests failed, 94.74% okay. make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 29 /usr/bin/make test -- NOT OK Running make install make test had returned bad status, won't install without force -----Original Message----- From: discuss-bounces(a)lists.surbl.org [mailto:discuss-bounces@lists.surbl.org] On Behalf Of Raymond Dijkxhoorn Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 08:04 To: SURBL Discussion list Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Hi! > t/open_redirect....NOK 2# Failed test (t/open_redirect.t at line 44) > t/open_redirect....NOK 3# Failed test (t/open_redirect.t at line 52) > t/open_redirect....ok 5/5# Looks like you failed 3 tests of 5. > t/open_redirect....dubious > Test returned status 3 (wstat 768, 0x300) > DIED. FAILED tests 1-3 > Failed 3/5 tests, 40.00% okay > t/spamcopuri.......ok > t/whitelist........ok > Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ------- > t/open_redirect.t 3 768 5 3 60.00% 1-3 > Failed 1/7 test scripts, 85.71% okay. 3/57 subtests failed, 94.74% okay. > make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 29 Did you try to install via CPAN ? So it can try to get the dependencies ? perl -MCPAN -e shell install Mail::SpamAssassin::SpamCopURI Bye, Raymond. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss(a)lists.surbl.org http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

2 1

by Mailing List 13 Jul '04

13 Jul '04

Got this output from the make test t/blacklist........ok t/dnsrbl...........ok t/extract_urls.....ok t/mailto...........ok t/open_redirect....NOK 1# Failed test (t/open_redirect.t at line 37) t/open_redirect....NOK 2# Failed test (t/open_redirect.t at line 44) t/open_redirect....NOK 3# Failed test (t/open_redirect.t at line 52) t/open_redirect....ok 5/5# Looks like you failed 3 tests of 5. t/open_redirect....dubious Test returned status 3 (wstat 768, 0x300) DIED. FAILED tests 1-3 Failed 3/5 tests, 40.00% okay t/spamcopuri.......ok t/whitelist........ok Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------- t/open_redirect.t 3 768 5 3 60.00% 1-3 Failed 1/7 test scripts, 85.71% okay. 3/57 subtests failed, 94.74% okay. make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 29 Any pointers ? Kindest Regards

2 1

edu.tw whitelist?
by Chris Santerre 13 Jul '04

13 Jul '04

As discussed on a nother list. These edu.tw are notorious for not being secure and open proxies. However that isn't what we list. SO I'm suggesting edu.tw domains get added to whitelist. Chris Santerre System Admin and SARE Ninja http://www.rulesemporium.com http://www.surbl.org 'It is not the strongest of the species that survives, not the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.' Charles Darwin

2 2

msu.edu hell yeah!
by Chris Santerre 13 Jul '04

13 Jul '04

Just wanted to let you guys know that MSU is using surbl.org. We rock ;) Chris Santerre System Admin and SARE Ninja http://www.rulesemporium.com http://www.surbl.org 'It is not the strongest of the species that survives, not the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.' Charles Darwin

4 3

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss