Discuss

discuss@lists.surbl.org

1862 discussions

RE: [SURBL-Discuss] browser plugin?
by Matthew.van.Eerde＠hbinc.com 14 Feb '06

14 Feb '06

Chris Santerre wrote: > I agree with Raymond. It makes sense to use it in a company that > mirrors the SURBL/URIBL data internaly. Then the proxy could cut down > on lookups. Or an ISP, I suppose... OK, I'll develop it for private use but keep an eye out for caching optimizations, and see how it goes. -- Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902 Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer

1 0

RE: [SURBL-Discuss] browser plugin?
by Chris Santerre 14 Feb '06

14 Feb '06

> -----Original Message----- > From: Raymond Dijkxhoorn [mailto:raymond@surbl.org] > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 2:48 AM > To: SURBL Discussion list > Subject: RE: [SURBL-Discuss] browser plugin? > > > Hi! > > >>> How does anyone else feel, particularly operators of our public > >>> nameservers? > > >> What would be the goal of a browser plugin? > > > To warn the browser's user (me, ATM) that the site they are > visiting is > > spamvertised and/or a reported phishing site. Useful for > those who do > > not have control over their mail server, especially if > they're using > > webmail. > > Any idea waht this would do to the nameservers we are > running, checking > each and every URI a user visits? Rather usefull but also > rather silly. > There are vendors allready doing this, they are free to use > the plugin, > but please dont use the public infrastructure for this goal. > Or are you > somehow distributing the data together with the plugin, dont think so? > > Thanks, > Raymond. I agree with Raymond. It makes sense to use it in a company that mirrors the SURBL/URIBL data internaly. Then the proxy could cut down on lookups. I've have actually posted the request to the Firefox people for a plugin, a long time ago. Back when I was with SURBL. They were very interested, but I honestly haven't looked back into it since going to URIBL. But using the public resources would put a strain on the mirrors. (and most likely get the abusive IPs rejected from connecting any further.) The idea has merit, but the implimintation is tricky. --Chris

1 0

Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Possible FP
by List Mail User 14 Feb '06

14 Feb '06

>Hi, > >macosxlabs*MANGLED*.org is listed in ws but the site is about some kind >of university project. FP ? > >Regards, > >-- >Herve Boulouis >... Indeed it is a CMU project, but it also was a comprimised machine that did spew a lot of spam. I'd assume it has been fixed by now, but the is just a (very likely) guess. Paul Shupak track(a)plectere.com

1 0

RE: [SURBL-Discuss] browser plugin?
by Matthew.van.Eerde＠hbinc.com 13 Feb '06

13 Feb '06

Jeff Chan wrote: > I'd be a little concerned about the new DNS queries it would generate. If load on the servers is a concern there are things that can be done: * Cache lookups for the duration of the session * Only look up the main document URL, not src= URLs * Allow a URL whitelist... bookmarked URLs * Skip lookups for HTTP servers on the local subnet or on My Computer etc. Ideas welcome. -- Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902 Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer

2 1

browser plugin?
by Matthew.van.Eerde＠hbinc.com 13 Feb '06

13 Feb '06

The IE7 phishing "feature" raises my privacy hackles... after trying to go through official Microsoft channels, I'm not getting anywhere. So I'm considering writing a browser plugin that checks SURBL. Has anyone already done this? -- Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902 Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer

3 2

Possible FP
by Herve Boulouis 13 Feb '06

13 Feb '06

Hi, macosxlabs*MANGLED*.org is listed in ws but the site is about some kind of university project. FP ? Regards, -- Herve Boulouis

2 1

RE: [SURBL-Discuss] rsync access turnaround
by Kristopher Austin 07 Feb '06

07 Feb '06

Tom, I assume Raymond's comment was in jest. I know they appreciate donations, but I seriously doubt it is a requirement for speedy treatment. Of course, he'll correct me if I'm wrong. Kris > -----Original Message----- > From: discuss-bounces(a)lists.surbl.org [mailto:discuss- > bounces(a)lists.surbl.org] On Behalf Of Tom Coelho > Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 1:04 PM > To: 'SURBL Discussion list' > Subject: RE: [SURBL-Discuss] rsync access turnaround > > Raymond, > > With that being said, what donation is enough to gain a timely response to > rsync access? Additionally, what about those organizations that cannot and > do not have access to PayPal to send a donation? (PayPal does not allow > membership or credit cards from my country) > > Most humble regards, > Tom > > -----Original Message----- > From: Raymond Dijkxhoorn [mailto:raymond@surbl.org] > Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 2:44 PM > To: SURBL Discussion list > Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] rsync access turnaround > > Hi! > > > I completed the rsync access request form about four weeks ago, but > > have not heard back from the SURBL administrators. I believe I > > fulfilled the requirements listed in the form (i.e. the email address > > I submitted contained my organization's domain name, the rsync client > > IP address is controlled by our organization, etc.). > > Most likely your donation wasnt big enough via the paypal button ;) > > > Has anyone been able to obtain rsync access in the past few weeks? > > Yes, but we have some backlog. > > Bye, > Raymond. > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss(a)lists.surbl.org > http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss(a)lists.surbl.org > http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

2 1

RE: [SURBL-Discuss] rsync access turnaround
by Tom Coelho 07 Feb '06

07 Feb '06

Raymond, With that being said, what donation is enough to gain a timely response to rsync access? Additionally, what about those organizations that cannot and do not have access to PayPal to send a donation? (PayPal does not allow membership or credit cards from my country) Most humble regards, Tom -----Original Message----- From: Raymond Dijkxhoorn [mailto:raymond@surbl.org] Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 2:44 PM To: SURBL Discussion list Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] rsync access turnaround Hi! > I completed the rsync access request form about four weeks ago, but > have not heard back from the SURBL administrators. I believe I > fulfilled the requirements listed in the form (i.e. the email address > I submitted contained my organization's domain name, the rsync client > IP address is controlled by our organization, etc.). Most likely your donation wasnt big enough via the paypal button ;) > Has anyone been able to obtain rsync access in the past few weeks? Yes, but we have some backlog. Bye, Raymond. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss(a)lists.surbl.org http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

1 0

rsync access turnaround
by Brandon Hutchinson 07 Feb '06

07 Feb '06

Greetings! I completed the rsync access request form about four weeks ago, but have not heard back from the SURBL administrators. I believe I fulfilled the requirements listed in the form (i.e. the email address I submitted contained my organization's domain name, the rsync client IP address is controlled by our organization, etc.). Has anyone been able to obtain rsync access in the past few weeks? Best regards, Brandon

2 1

FW: META: [not@home.today: Norman De Forest - sad news]
by Chris Santerre 06 Feb '06

06 Feb '06

This is extremly sad news. Those that dealt with Norman, know what a great help he was. He will be greatly missed. Posted to SPAM-L.... ----- Forwarded message from Ant <not(a)home.today> ----- > From: Ant <not(a)home.today> > Newsgroups: alt.comp.virus,news.admin.net-abuse.email > Subject: Norman De Forest - sad news > Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 20:55:27 -0000 > > "It is with great sadness that we announce the passing away of > Norman De Forest ... In poor health and living in extreme poverty, > Norman's mind was rarely fettered by his circumstances and he quite > literally has helped thousands of people, both through Chebucto and > the internet and in real life. Like most truly generous people, he > kept his charity to himself and it is likely nobody alive knows the > true extent of his caring..." > > http://beacon.chebucto.info/news.shtml > > ----- End forwarded message -----

1 0

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss