Hi!
Yes, but I want to add that there _WILL_ be a "BigEvil style" cf version of ws.surbl.org for those people who won't/can't use the SURBL net lookups for some strange reason. This is still being worked on. One of the main reasons I haven't updates BE in a while is because I've been working on the new WS submission stuff. (Thanks to everyone who is involved in that!)
Thanks, I forgot about that other direction of rules style entries moving from sa-blacklist back into bigevil.cf. Sounds like the best of both worlds in a nice mirror of both types:
A. ws.surbl.org gets all the "static" domains from BigEvil, sa-blacklist, etc. in the form of a SURBL.
B. BigEvil.cf gets all the domains, including those from sa-blacklist, heavily wildcarded ones, etc. in the form of a ruleset.
I dont see the problem listsing them inside a SURBL. The extra few kb it will take on the nameservers ? For me i would like to put the preassure on DNS, not on every single box that has to do expression lookups, those will cost a lot more CPU... Most of the times its not the nameservers that cant keep up, but the mailboxes...
Also: *when should we announce that be domains are now in ws, and that people should stop using be?* Is everyone comfortable that the combined ws is now working as expected, including the be domains being folded in?
Yes. Let me know when i should start slaving them. Same applies for the rsync...
Bye, Raymond.