Hi!
Maybe I'm reading into things, but your tone seems a bit harsh. To be sure, let me say that nobody here or on that other forum has bitched or complained about this. SURBL got rave reviews on that other site. I did forward this information to that site as Jeff requested to help educate them.
Yes and no, i would be very disappointed if people mis-use SURBL and then say it gives FPs. So if you helped out, thanks. The 'tone' was only to make clear its not smart to use SURBL on headers.
We put a lot of time in the project, handchecking the items and so on... only to avoid and bring down FP rates. This is really timeconsuming as you can understand.
benefits/drawback using real-world data. I understand that this is not the prescribed way to use SURBL... but, even if I don't like the results, this may be beneficial as a "flagging" or "scoring" system where I could then allow these particular messages through, but have then handy to see what is not getting blocked by other filtering.
Ok, clear.
Thanks for your explanation.
Bye, Raymond.