Good afternoon, Ryan,
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, Ryan Thompson wrote:
OK. Good discussion so far! By all means, keep the comments coming. Right now, though, I'd like to formalize my current thinking into two cases:
- This mailing list traffic ought to be exempt from spam filters, and we ought not to be required to munge domains sent to this mailing list. So, I suggest we send bare domains to this list, without munging.
I get the impression you're pushing hard for no munging at all to this list. Are you using an automated script to extract domains? If so, how hard would it be to add:
sed -e 's/-MUNGED//'
to the beginning?
<P>However, when sending domains via <EM>private email</EM>, it may be necessary to munge the domain to prevent the recipient's filter from hitting your email. Use a simple munging system that preserves the human readability of the domain, while preventing filters from picking up the URI. For example:</P> <PRE>spamdomain.com-MUNGED</PRE> <P>Note that the -MUNGED should appear at the end (or the beginning) of the URI, not in the middle, as this makes it difficult to read, and copy/paste the domain.</P>
Those may still be caught by other filters. That's the whole point of sticking "-MUNGED" in the middle, or my suggestion of a single space before ".com", which won't affect human readability. What was your opinion of that idea? Perhaps you didn't see the last time I proposed it because my last message ended up in you spam folder. *griiiiiin* Cheers, - Bill
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Freedom of the press is limited to those who own one." -- A. J. Liebling -------------------------------------------------------------------------- William Stearns (wstearns@pobox.com). Mason, Buildkernel, freedups, p0f, rsync-backup, ssh-keyinstall, dns-check, more at: http://www.stearns.org --------------------------------------------------------------------------