25 Oct
2004
25 Oct
'04
7:02 p.m.
On Monday, October 25, 2004, 8:45:24 AM, Chris Santerre wrote:
I have an SURBL submission from a VERY reputible person. With a very good explanation as to how the email address spam'd should NEVER have gotten this email. Now according to WS policy it would NOT be listed because it may have legit uses. Therefore I'm adding it to UC not WS.
Actually that's more of a SURBL policy than a WS one. We don't want false positives on SURBLs because they make the lists less usable.
Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."