Hi!
[root@vmx01 spamhaus]# more xbl-extras $SOA 3600 need.to.know.only. hostmaster.spamhaus.org. 0 1h 10m 5d 1200 x.ns.spamhaus.org y.ns.spamhaus.org z.ns.spamhaus.org $NS 86400 c.ns.spamhaus.org
...
$NS 86400 y.ns.spamhaus.org $NS 86400 z.ns.spamhaus.org
(Any ideas why they list c through z twice?)
If i am right the old format only supported one NS at a line. But in new rbldnsd ones thats not needed anymore.
They are not needed for rbldnsd to function however.
Hmm, that's pretty much what Mark Reynolds was asking for earlier: rbldnsd headers and domains supplied separately.
Should we perhaps offer them separately also, in addition to the existing complete rbldnsd zone files?
Wont harm.
I suppose our "extras" could include the testpoints and @ record, as in (basically the top of the file but not the spam domains):
I would leave those in the zonefile itself, the extra is 'unneeded' data like NS sets.
6.surbl.org ns7.surbl.org ns8.surbl.org ns9.surbl.org ns10.surbl.org ns11.surbl. org ns12.surbl.org ns13.surbl.org ns14.surbl.org :127.0.0.2:Message body contains SpamCop spamvertised domain. @ 66.170.2.60 test.surbl.org :2:sc.surbl.org permanent test point test.sc.surbl.org :2:sc.surbl.org permanent test point surbl-org-permanent-test-point.com :2:sc.surbl.org permanent test point 2.0.0.127 :2:sc.surbl.org permanent test point
We could name such new files with something like:
sc.surbl.org.headers.rbldnsd sc.surbl.org.domains.rbldnsd
Please dont change the curent names, only add .extra for the new one.
Bye, Raymond.