I like it. While it hasn't completely nuked the geocities spam we were seeing, it has put a significant dent in it.
warren_ro@compuserve.com 12/13/2005 12:33 am >>>
Hi All,
Any feedback on how effective this is ?
Regards Warren
----- Original Message ----- From: "Eric Montréal" erv@mailpeers.net To: "Jeff Chan" jeffc@surbl.org; "SURBL Discussion list" discuss@lists.surbl.org Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 11:57 AM Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Re: One way to handle the Geocities spam
Jeff Chan wrote:
On Friday, December 2, 2005, 3:31:41 PM, Eric Montréal wrote:
I've made my own auto-generated spamassassin rules for both Geocities and Tripod spam.
This list is similar in it's principles to the good old BigEvilList ...
You can download and test it from there: http://nospam.mailpeers.net/
Feedback appreciated (good or bad, in or outside of the list) ...
This would work, but it could be somewhat difficult to maintain
The list generation / maintenance is somewhat automated and will be even more if there is enough interest for it.
What I would need now is a broader set of URLs, since I only have a partial view of what's going on at a global level.
and distribute.
Not sure what you mean by distribution, but if successful, it might need mirrors.
Note that that doesn't mean I think it's a bad idea. Anything that reasonably stops spam is a positive IMO.
Should work as the BigEvil list worked ... until it became too big and you found a way to solve the problem ...
In the meantime those rules are easy to add and don't require any change in Spamassassin.
Jeff C.
Don't harm innocent bystanders.
I'll do my best ;-)
Eric _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.surbl.org http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.surbl.org http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss