Good morning, all,
On Sun, 11 Apr 2004, Jeff Chan wrote:
On Sunday, April 11, 2004, 12:59:57 AM, Jeff Chan wrote:
On Sunday, April 11, 2004, 12:29:43 AM, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
I have a concern about the rule. Bill Stern's SpamAssassin blacklist is a blacklist *for* SpamAssassin, so I think the naming of your rule and the DNSBL name (sa.surbl.org) are unintentionally a bit misleading since the list is not maintained by the ASF or SpamAssassin. I think it would be a good idea to rename the DNSBL and the rule to make this clearer. Maybe we should encourage (or help) Bill Stern to pick a snappy name. :-)
Fair enough. I picked sa.surbl.org out of thin air since his rule started with "sa" and to give oblique credit to the original motivation for his rule, if not the precise source.
I picked sa-blacklist to give homage to the spamassassin developers too. Oh well.
Bill, anyone, got some better names? I prefer two letters. (sa and sc were kind of confusing anyway.) "sb" for Sa-Blacklist anyone? LOL! ;-)
The abbreviation isn't important. If Daniel wants if changed, then "ws" is fine with me. "sb" still sounds like a spamassassin blacklist - and I fear that's not far enough away from spamassassin. Cheers, - Bill
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- "We don't want an election without a paper trail...all three owners of the companies who make these machines are donors to the Bush administration. Is this not corruption?" -- Gore Vidal (Courtesy of http://www.laweekly.com/ink/03/52/features-cooper.php) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- William Stearns (wstearns@pobox.com). Mason, Buildkernel, freedups, p0f, rsync-backup, ssh-keyinstall, dns-check, more at: http://www.stearns.org --------------------------------------------------------------------------