Hi!
We can include in multi, why not...
Nope... One of the ideas behind multi is that lazy sysadmins can put only one rule and if that hit, then 'subrl hit'.
Lazy sysadmins dont do anything ;)
I think this MUST NOT be in multi.
I still think it does, it will save lookups also, within most applications.
Anyone ?
I concord with Steven's comment... this MUST NOT be called 'greylist' because that term is already beeing used for something completely different... I'd like a name that implies that it WILL have FPs... it can be the elegant 'unconfirmed.surbl.org' as Seteven suggested or something on the line of 'this-has-false-positives.surbl.org' or 'dont-use-this-if-you-re-stupid.surbl.org' :-)
No, greylist is perhaps not the best name for a list like that, evil.surbl or something or unfomfirmed fits better.
IIRC the other items Jeff adds to the whitelist are simply domains that hit a FP (like the ones I reportes 10 minutes ago). These MUST NOT be whitelisted in the new list, since it would loose its meaning, 'cause that's Jeff's way to promptly react to FP's in any list.
Thats no big problem, its two seperate files anyway...
Bye, Raymond.