-----Original Message----- From: David B Funk [mailto:dbfunk@engineering.uiowa.edu] Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 5:10 PM To: SURBL Discussion list Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Discuss: WAS: SURBL+ Checker Submission
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, Chris Santerre wrote:
I stripped the header for this discussion. Is this a spam
domain or an
attempt to poison SURBL. It is obviously a spam, but is domain bogus?
-----Original Message-----
*SNIP*
[snip..]
href=3D"http://hesatosser.com.info/?wid=3D100005%22%3EH= ERE</a><br><br>
[snip..]
<a href=3D"http://hesatosser.com.info/?wid=3D100005%22%3E Get it now
[snip..]
href=3D"http://http://hesatosser.com.com/nomore.html%22%3EGo here</a> to stop=
Neither, it's broken spam-ware. The actual pill-spam-site is "hesatosser .com" (which is listed in SURBL ;).
"*.com.com" is a valid domain name, belongs to CNet, clearly not spam. "*.com.info" isn't even a valid domain at all.
Thanks dave, that is what I thought. Helped to hear it from someone else :)
--Chris