Jeff Chan wrote:
I would contend abuse of spamarrest's services, as you originally described them, is closer to a Joe Job than outright spam by spamarrest.
IBTD. And if you read some of the 166 messages shown by...
http://www.google.com/groups?q=spamarrest.com+group%3A*.net-abuse.*+-group%3A*.sightings
...you'll find that I'm not exactly alone with this opinion.
[co.to vs. oo.to]
the site is oo.to, not co.to
Sorry. http://oo.cx/domains/home.php claims that this is a "iRedirector (subdomain edition)" in it's <title>, and I get the same page at http://oo.to/domains/home.php, dito nn.to, dito uu.to
I found no abuse report links, but testing some of the domains mentioned in nanas they _might_ do something about abuse (or my old browser simply can't handle their weird JavaScripts (?)).
Bye, Frank