Chris,
What was the reason WS got such a low score in SA 3.0??? .5 is a joke! Hell BigEvil was scored a 3 and now one complained, and it is the same data!! I don't understand. Did the mass check not go well?
We pointed this out several times, the mass checker found way too many FP's and so SA decided to score it lower. Its 'our own' problem, we have to get out those FP's. The scoring is done with SA 3.1 again, so lets try to do better there...
And yes, i am disappointed also with this very low scoring, personally i have raised it via my local.cf.
Bye, Raymond