Fixed just now. I've informed the person who submitted it. I couldn't find anything bad on them. But sometimes this submitter does. I've whitelisted them.
--Chris
-----Original Message----- From: Lindsay Snider [mailto:lindsay@pa.net] Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 10:58 AM To: discuss@lists.surbl.org Subject: [SURBL-Discuss] fp mailscanner dot info
I noticed mailscanner dot info is in ws.surbl.org and I believe this to be incorrect. Do we have an alternate more automated way of dealing w/ false positives?
Best Regards, Lindsay _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.surbl.org http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 11:12:54 -0400, Chris Santerre csanterre@merchantsoverseas.com wrote:
Fixed just now. I've informed the person who submitted it. I couldn't find anything bad on them. But sometimes this submitter does. I've whitelisted them.
--Chris
(S)He'd better check that out thoroughly before... MailScanner dot info is the official home of MailScanner, which is a (very good) antispam/antivirus server tool... it does integrate SURBL via SA and its great!
The possible problems your submitter might have had would be:
1) a foolish sysadmin enabling spam bounces to faked 'mail from:' addresses which could include a default signature including www.mailscanner-MUNGED.info (and possibly www.transtec.co.uk).
2) a joe-job.
-----Original Message----- From: Lindsay Snider [mailto:lindsay@pa.net] Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 10:58 AM To: discuss@lists.surbl.org Subject: [SURBL-Discuss] fp mailscanner dot info
I noticed mailscanner dot info is in ws.surbl.org and I believe this to be incorrect. Do we have an alternate more automated way of dealing w/ false positives?
Best Regards, Lindsay _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.surbl.org http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.surbl.org http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Hi!
(S)He'd better check that out thoroughly before... MailScanner dot info is the official home of MailScanner, which is a (very good) antispam/antivirus server tool... it does integrate SURBL via SA and its great!
The possible problems your submitter might have had would be:
- a foolish sysadmin enabling spam bounces to faked 'mail from:'
addresses which could include a default signature including www.mailscanner-MUNGED.info (and possibly www.transtec.co.uk).
If he/she would have looked on the page, eg, handchecked the submission then this would have never happened. Very very silly.
Bye, Raymond.
-
Chris Santerre -
Mariano Absatz -
Raymond Dijkxhoorn