OUCH I'm farther behind then I thought!! I have 2 lists, one 416 domains, the other 347 domains. All to be checked. And that's not all!!!! So if two people would each take a list, I could work on the other 500+.
HELP!!!!
:)
--Chris
-----Original Message----- From: Raymond Dijkxhoorn [mailto:raymond@prolocation.net] Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 2:23 PM To: SURBL Discussion list Subject: RE: [SURBL-Discuss] FP's in ws.surbl.org
Hi Chris,
just wondering if anyone else has reported FPs for
ws.surbl.org, if so
how long did the removal take?
While I'm here, can anyone else confirm that spam submissions to http://www.rulesemporium.com/cgi-bin/uribl.cgi?report=1 get read.
They ABSOLUTELY get read. Usually quite quickly. However
they all need to
be hand checked. Currently I'm 236 submissions behind for
just that. About
400 submissions behind on another. Soooo much to do!
If there is a way to help you on this, let us know.
Bye, Raymond. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.surbl.org http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
On Monday, August 2, 2004, 11:35:40 AM, Chris Santerre wrote:
OUCH I'm farther behind then I thought!! I have 2 lists, one 416 domains, the other 347 domains. All to be checked. And that's not all!!!! So if two people would each take a list, I could work on the other 500+.
Looks like we need a clearinghouse so multiple people can help check these. It needn't be the fancy one Paul proposed; just some way to distribute them.
Does anyone have a trouble ticket system already running that we could use and feed these into?
Jeff C.
Hi!
OUCH I'm farther behind then I thought!! I have 2 lists, one 416 domains, the other 347 domains. All to be checked. And that's not all!!!! So if two people would each take a list, I could work on the other 500+.
Looks like we need a clearinghouse so multiple people can help check these. It needn't be the fancy one Paul proposed; just some way to distribute them.
Does anyone have a trouble ticket system already running that we could use and feed these into?
We allready worked away the backlog, so pump in some new ones. Chris is bored :) heh.
Ohw, btw, we just passed the 40k domains on WS.
Buy, Raymond.
Hi!
Ohw, btw, we just passed the 40k domains on WS.
How did it jump from 28k (already with MS and JW?) to 38k?
I added some more from /dev/random :)
No, seriously, aturday i made a mistake, on the server end, so the MS and JW data was just added with this last new update. That explains the grow i guess.
And the backlog that Chris had is also gone now, he added also a load from the website submissions, helped him a little with those also.
Bye, Raymond.
On Monday, August 2, 2004, 2:21:18 PM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
the MS and JW data was just added with this last new update. That explains the grow i guess.
And the backlog that Chris had is also gone now, he added also a load from the website submissions, helped him a little with those also.
Ah, ok thanks! Sounds like most of the jump was probably from JW.
Jeff C.
On Monday, August 2, 2004, 2:23:48 PM, Jeff Chan wrote:
On Monday, August 2, 2004, 2:21:18 PM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
the MS and JW data was just added with this last new update. That explains the grow i guess.
And the backlog that Chris had is also gone now, he added also a load from the website submissions, helped him a little with those also.
Ah, ok thanks! Sounds like most of the jump was probably from JW.
BTW As a sanity check, I see most of the JW and MS entries in WS now. SO it looks like things are working.o Jeff C.
Hi!
And the backlog that Chris had is also gone now, he added also a load from the website submissions, helped him a little with those also.
Ah, ok thanks! Sounds like most of the jump was probably from JW.
BTW As a sanity check, I see most of the JW and MS entries in WS now. SO it looks like things are working.o
Yeah. I'll have an eye on tomorows stats :)
Bye, Raymond.
Jeff Chan wrote:
Looks like we need a clearinghouse so multiple people can help check these. It needn't be the fancy one Paul proposed; just some way to distribute them.
I wonder if it would make sense to use a Bugzilla installation in this context; see http://www.bugzilla.org/ for reference.
-
Chris Santerre -
Jeff Chan -
Ralph Seichter -
Raymond Dijkxhoorn