Jeff,
Any idea's when xs will be included into multi?
Darrell
On Tuesday, August 9, 2005, 3:16:03 PM, Rob McEwen wrote:
Darrell asked:
Any idea's when xs will be included into multi?
And sc2, too?
Pretty sure sc2 is going to become sc, but have not decided when to do it yet. For internal reasons it somewhat depends on whether Raymond is able to use the CBL data well.
Jeff C. -- Don't harm innocent bystanders.
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 20:14 -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
On Tuesday, August 9, 2005, 3:16:03 PM, Rob McEwen wrote:
Darrell asked:
Any idea's when xs will be included into multi?
And sc2, too?
Pretty sure sc2 is going to become sc, but have not decided when to do it yet. For internal reasons it somewhat depends on whether Raymond is able to use the CBL data well.
Jeff C.
Don't harm innocent bystanders.
Both xs and sc2 have been working quite well for me, and I look forward to seeing them go into production. I hadn't said anything sooner for several reasons. I am a home user, and usually don't get more than 800 to 1,200 emails per day. Within the last month I moved from using SA attached to my email program, that by default, "just works, no maintenance required", to setting it up with my mail server. The biggest reason I haven't said anything is the fact I am a real noo bee, and although everything is working quite well, I'm obviously not calling SA properly, as it doesn't log. No biggie, just embarrasses me not to have a log showing how xs and sc2 were working for me in relation to others. I'll keep reading and tweaking, and sooner or later have it working like the "Big Boys'" do. Since it's not mission critical, it's an enjoyable hobby, and learning experience doing it the "hard way", reading and trying things.
Roy
Hi!
And sc2, too?
Pretty sure sc2 is going to become sc, but have not decided when to do it yet. For internal reasons it somewhat depends on whether Raymond is able to use the CBL data well.
So far thats looking promising. We will start processing more often after the weekend i hope. Need to migrate some things to another machine. Got some other things going to make it even stronger and faster (see private mail Jeff).
Bye, Raymond.
On Tuesday, August 9, 2005, 3:04:47 PM, Darrell (support@invariantsystems.com) wrote:
Jeff,
Any idea's when xs will be included into multi?
Hi Darrell, At this point the CBL data are more likely to end up in JP. Our experiments with XS look pretty good, but Raymond's server infrastructure is better able to keep up with the volume of data than mine.
Raymond may be able to give an update on how that is looking, whether it's gaining him significant new data, etc.
I still find the XS data useful internally, but may stop publishing it in the form of the separate test list at some point.
Jeff C. -- Don't harm innocent bystanders.
Hi!
Any idea's when xs will be included into multi?
At this point the CBL data are more likely to end up in JP. Our experiments with XS look pretty good, but Raymond's server infrastructure is better able to keep up with the volume of data than mine.
Raymond may be able to give an update on how that is looking, whether it's gaining him significant new data, etc.
Yes, its looking good. We feed the stronglyh filtered CBL data into JP now. We currently parse them once an hour and end of the week we will do that with a somehow smaller timeframe. We are moving this subset to a own processing box...
I still find the XS data useful internally, but may stop publishing it in the form of the separate test list at some point.
As a seperate list its i think too little data. But lets see once we get the more raw datafeed running with them.
Bye, Raymond.
On Wednesday, August 10, 2005, 4:51:38 PM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
I still find the XS data useful internally, but may stop publishing it in the form of the separate test list at some point.
As a seperate list its i think too little data. But lets see once we get the more raw datafeed running with them.
Actually I think the resulting data in XS is pretty good, it's just too slow processing on my server. Small lists are ok if they hit a lot of spam. That's more important than a big list: how much current spam does it actually hit?
Jeff C. -- Don't harm innocent bystanders.
-
Darrell (support＠invariantsystems.com) -
Jeff Chan -
Raymond Dijkxhoorn -
Raymond Dijkxhoorn -
Rob McEwen -
Roy