----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Chan" jeffc@surbl.org To: discuss@lists.surbl.org Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2004 9:56 PM Subject: Re: [SURBL-Discuss] FP on WS & DS
On Sunday, September 26, 2004, 9:50:09 PM, Bill Landry wrote:
vault. com is listed on WS & DS.
And? Tell us a little about them, please. If you think it's an FP, tell us why....
I am following the same standard as others that ask for whitelist items on this list. If you don't want to whitelist vault, no sweat since I handle these on my end anyway. Just trying to help others, but I certainly do not need the hassle.
Bill
On Sunday, September 26, 2004, 10:31:24 PM, Bill Landry wrote:
From: "Jeff Chan" jeffc@surbl.org
On Sunday, September 26, 2004, 9:50:09 PM, Bill Landry wrote:
vault. com is listed on WS & DS.
And? Tell us a little about them, please. If you think it's an FP, tell us why....
I am following the same standard as others that ask for whitelist items on this list. If you don't want to whitelist vault, no sweat since I handle these on my end anyway. Just trying to help others, but I certainly do not need the hassle.
Bill
OK. To everybody: If you think something is an FP, please do us a minor courtesy and say why. None of these things is 100% certain, so providing more information helps everyone! We don't know everything in the Universe; your help is welcomed and needed.
To Bill: Quit whining. ;-)
Thanks,
Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Chan" jeffc@surbl.org
On Sunday, September 26, 2004, 9:50:09 PM, Bill Landry wrote:
vault. com is listed on WS & DS.
And? Tell us a little about them, please. If you think it's an FP, tell us why....
I am following the same standard as others that ask for whitelist items
on
this list. If you don't want to whitelist vault, no sweat since I
handle
these on my end anyway. Just trying to help others, but I certainly do
not
need the hassle.
OK. To everybody: If you think something is an FP, please do us a minor courtesy and say why. None of these things is 100% certain, so providing more information helps everyone! We don't know everything in the Universe; your help is welcomed and needed.
To Bill: Quit whining. ;-)
No wonder you have such low participation from others on this list - who needs the BS...? ;-)
Bill
On Sunday, September 26, 2004, 10:57:03 PM, Bill Landry wrote:
From: "Jeff Chan" jeffc@surbl.org
To Bill: Quit whining. ;-)
No wonder you have such low participation from others on this list - who needs the BS...? ;-)
Bill
Would you like some cheese with your whine? :-)
Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."
vault. com is listed on WS & DS.
A domain registered in 1997 with name servers that have no SBL records seems like an unlikely candidate for listing.
Joe
On Sunday, September 26, 2004, 11:12:39 PM, Joe Wein wrote:
vault. com is listed on WS & DS.
A domain registered in 1997 with name servers that have no SBL records seems like an unlikely candidate for listing.
Indeed. Vault.com appears to be an old career/jobs type site that has some minor abuse problems judging by NANAS hits. As you note they have no SBL hits. If they were persistent spammers over the years, SBL probably would have noticed them. I'm whitelisting them.
Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."
----- Original Message ----- From: "Joe Wein" joewein@pobox.com
vault. com is listed on WS & DS.
A domain registered in 1997 with name servers that have no SBL records
seems
like an unlikely candidate for listing.
Yep, seemed like a no-brainer to me, as well.
Bill
-
Bill Landry -
Jeff Chan -
Joe Wein