Good grief I have been going thru the domains submitted into SURBL and came up with a nasty kiddie pron site. Anyone here have contact with Secret Service or anyone else for that matter? I don't want the site just shutdown, I want these guys caught.
*Warning, very disturbing site!*
haydn.e-pid.org
Address: 61.128.198.123 resolved to haydn.e-pid.org AS: 61.128.128.0/17 AS4134 [CN] Data Communications Bureau Beijing Net 61.128.128-255 CHINANET-CQ [CN] @ns.chinanet.cn.net
--Chris
Hi there,
Good grief I have been going thru the domains submitted into SURBL and came up with a nasty kiddie pron site. Anyone here have contact with Secret Service or anyone else for that matter? I don't want the site just shutdown, I want these guys caught.
Couldn't agree more!
*Warning, very disturbing site!*
[link removed]
Address: 61.128.xxx.xxx resolved to [removed] AS: 61.128.128.0/17 AS4134 [CN] Data Communications Bureau Beijing Net 61.128.128-255 CHINANET-CQ [CN] @ns.chinanet.cn.net
I did a small search at google: http://www.reportchildporn.com/modules.php?name=News&new_topic=13
"HONG KONG, China (CNN) -- Authorities in the U.S. and U.K. say they are closing the net on online pedophiles, but the crackdown stops at China's borders where a legal bind is making child porn permissible.
Perpetrators are walking free since neither mainland China nor Hong Kong have laws against downloading child pornography."
This is from September 29th, 2003 - I hope the attitude has changed since then..
I reported the page to a national organistation "Save the children" - I hope they are able to do something about it, at least contact the authorities in China.
Regards,
/Brian
Wow! I couldn't stomach letting the entire page load. I've reported this site to the Norwegian computer crime division. With regards to child-pornography, they have investigative units that co-operate internationally with other such law-enforcement organizations. (That way they can synchronize raids on child-porno rings on an large geographical basis!)
Let's hope they get them!
--- Regards, Roger WJ Alterskjær IT Consultant Museum of Natural History and Archaeology, NTNU (+47) 73 59 79 78
Chris Santerre wrote:
Good grief I have been going thru the domains submitted into SURBL and came up with a nasty kiddie pron site. Anyone here have contact with Secret Service or anyone else for that matter? I don't want the site just shutdown, I want these guys caught.
*Warning, very disturbing site!*
< snip >
Hi!
The "issue" mentionned above got me thinking and I was wondering if anybody knows of a way of using a (SU)RBL with a browser (without having to use a proxy).
[A la "Content Advisor" in IE...]
I did a search on the web but didn't found anything interesting...
Thanks!
Nick
PS: BTW, I was curious to see if by now the site mentionned abouve would have been closed and I'm sorry to say it is still up... )-; )-; )-; (one would have thought that by now it would have been closed down...)
Good morning, Nicolas,
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004, Nicolas Riendeau wrote:
Chris Santerre wrote:
*Warning, very disturbing site!*
The "issue" mentionned above got me thinking and I was wondering if anybody knows of a way of using a (SU)RBL with a browser (without having to use a proxy).
What's the problem with using a proxy? I have instructions at http://www.stearns.org/sa-blacklist/ on how to use the sa-blacklist (the data underlying ws.surbl.org) in both squid and privoxy, using those proxies to block web access to the spammer web sites. Squid, at least, is available on both unix and windows (see http://www.cygwin.com). If you use a different proxy, I'd be glad to work with you to provide the sa-blacklist in a form suitable for that proxy. Cheers, - Bill
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- "... Had this been an actual emergency, we would have fled in terror, and you would not have been informed." -- Eric Steele v2steele@us.ibm.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------- William Stearns (wstearns@pobox.com). Mason, Buildkernel, freedups, p0f, rsync-backup, ssh-keyinstall, dns-check, more at: http://www.stearns.org --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Good morning, Nicolas,
Hi William!
What's the problem with using a proxy? I have instructions at http://www.stearns.org/sa-blacklist/ on how to use the sa-blacklist (the data underlying ws.surbl.org) in both squid and privoxy, using those proxies to block web access to the spammer web sites. Squid, at least, is available on both unix and windows (see http://www.cygwin.com).
Thanks, I didn't know that...
The fact that it works on Windows would take care of one of the problems as the number of *nix admins where I work is somewhat limited compared to the number of Windows admins...
Only problem left now would be to convince them to invest in the necessary hardware...
If you use a different proxy, I'd be glad to work with you to provide the sa-blacklist in a form suitable for that proxy. Cheers,
- Bill
Thanks!
Nick
Ahh that's a great idea I never thought of! Made the additions to squid and will test it out later. Thanks for the info.
William Stearns wrote:
What's the problem with using a proxy? I have instructions at http://www.stearns.org/sa-blacklist/ on how to use the sa-blacklist (the data underlying ws.surbl.org) in both squid and privoxy, using those proxies to block web access to the spammer web sites.
-
Brian Ipsen -
Chris Santerre -
Jeff Taylor -
Nicolas Riendeau -
Roger WJ Alterskjær -
William Stearns