Can anyone explain why this particular URI gets tagged by WS when none of the other URIs in the message (including several others from g.msn.com) get tagged:
http://g.msn.MUNGEDcom/0NL34044/2531
Must be something about this particular URI string that causes the parser to handle it differently. If someone wants to see the message this URI came from, let me know and I'll send it to you.
Bill
On Wednesday, August 18, 2004, 5:43:58 PM, Bill Landry wrote:
Can anyone explain why this particular URI gets tagged by WS when none of the other URIs in the message (including several others from g.msn.com) get tagged:
http://g.msn.MUNGEDcom/0NL34044/2531
Must be something about this particular URI string that causes the parser to handle it differently. If someone wants to see the message this URI came from, let me know and I'll send it to you.
msn.com is of course whitelisted. Please forward me the message. Some of the developers might like to see it also.
Jeff C.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Landry" billl@pointshare.com
Can anyone explain why this particular URI gets tagged by WS when none of the other URIs in the message (including several others from g.msn.com)
get
tagged:
http://g.msn.MUNGEDcom/0NL34044/2531Must be something about this particular URI string that causes the parser
to
handle it differently. If someone wants to see the message this URI came from, let me know and I'll send it to you.
Replying to my own post. I see now that the URI above gets redirected to:
http://qspace.iplace.MUNGEDcom/cobrands/41/?sc=1452NLCRamp;&CM=MHHNewsle...
and "iplace.com" is listed in WS. So my next questions is, should "iplace.com" be listed in WS?
Bill
On Wednesday, August 18, 2004, 6:17:26 PM, Bill Landry wrote:
Replying to my own post. I see now that the URI above gets redirected to:
http://qspace.iplace.MUNGEDcom/cobrands/41/?sc=1452NLCRamp;&CM=MHHNewsle...
and "iplace.com" is listed in WS. So my next questions is, should "iplace.com" be listed in WS?
Probably not. Anyone know if these guys are spammers or why it's on WS?
Name: icreditreport.com Address: 205.180.159.210 Aliases: qspace.iplace.com
If this appeared in a legitimate message, then we probably should whitelist. Was it in a ham?
Comments?
Jeff C.
On Wednesday, August 18, 2004, 6:51:51 PM, Jeff Chan wrote:
On Wednesday, August 18, 2004, 6:17:26 PM, Bill Landry wrote:
Replying to my own post. I see now that the URI above gets redirected to:
http://qspace.iplace.MUNGEDcom/cobrands/41/?sc=1452NLCRamp;&CM=MHHNewsle...
and "iplace.com" is listed in WS. So my next questions is, should "iplace.com" be listed in WS?
Probably not. Anyone know if these guys are spammers or why it's on WS?
Name: icreditreport.com Address: 205.180.159.210 Aliases: qspace.iplace.com
If this appeared in a legitimate message, then we probably should whitelist. Was it in a ham?
OK Bill says this appeared in an MSN newsletter, a definite ham, so I am whitelisting:
icreditreport.com iplace.com
Both were on WS and probably should come off it.
Jeff C.
-
Bill Landry -
Jeff Chan