Hi, something I saw in a SpamCop discussion:
news://news.spamcop.net/csv88p$met$1@news.spamcop.net http://news.spamcop.net/pipermail/spamcop-list/2005-January/096914.html | I don't know of any other method of feeding spamvertised urls to any of | the subsections of surbl described here http://www.surbl.org/lists.html
Apparently that FAQ isn't answered in the FAQ (?). Therefore I tried to find an answer, but that ended with a "403 forbidden" causing a "404 not found" for the URL http://www.rulesemporium.com/cgi-bin/?report=1
So what is the answer for this FAQ ? Bye, Frank
On Saturday, January 22, 2005, 9:05:05 PM, Frank Ellermann wrote:
Hi, something I saw in a SpamCop discussion:
news://news.spamcop.net/csv88p$met$1@news.spamcop.net http://news.spamcop.net/pipermail/spamcop-list/2005-January/096914.html | I don't know of any other method of feeding spamvertised urls to any of | the subsections of surbl described here http://www.surbl.org/lists.html
Apparently that FAQ isn't answered in the FAQ (?). Therefore I tried to find an answer, but that ended with a "403 forbidden" causing a "404 not found" for the URL http://www.rulesemporium.com/cgi-bin/?report=1
Yes, the submission form seems down right now:
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN">
<html><head> <title>403 Forbidden</title> </head><body> <h1>Forbidden</h1> <p>You don't have permission to access /cgi-bin/ on this server.</p> <p>Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.</p> <hr /> <address>Apache/2.0.40 Server at www.rulesemporium.com Port 80</address> </body></html>
Not sure why. Maybe the SARE ninjas can check it?
So what is the answer for this FAQ ? Bye, Frank
Well the answer is in the lists document: different data sources have different inputs. SC and AB use SpamCop reports as input. JP and OB use private traps as input. WS is a manual list.
That said, I've updated the Lists document slightly to reflect this and added a FAQ entry also.
http://www.surbl.org/faq.html#reporting
Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."
Jeff Chan wrote:
SC and AB use SpamCop reports as input.
Okay, nothing to do here for SC users, normal spam reports with SpamCop are good enough.
JP and OB use private traps as input.
Also clear, stuff found by Joe etc. or by outblaze.
WS is a manual list.
That's what I tested (resulting in a 403 + 404 ;-)
That said, I've updated the Lists document slightly to reflect this and added a FAQ entry also. http://www.surbl.org/faq.html#reporting
Thanks. I've posted a pointer to this thread in the SpamCop newsgroup. The most interesting SURBL for SC reporters is probably PH, if they send their reports to one of the PH addresses mentioned in your article
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.rbl.surbl/3754
Bye, Frank