Hi!
Our favorite pill spammers also try to get around SURBL now.
I dont want to end up making SA rulesets for this, any suggestions ?
ns3.airmaramba.biz ns3.avk29.biz
The same crap... But, with less SA hits now, since its not touched by SURBL. Bah.
---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 01:50:29 +0100 From: kenneth clakley auroraschorn@rfc.every1.net To: wilfredo moote reyes@prolocation.net Subject: important reduce wrise renkles & skin spots
suc-oneonta sony-steo lettery
From inside to outside, from w^eig_ht l`o^ss to skin care. From mental
relief to physical relief, from antidepressant to muscle relaxant. The care inside out.
you can copy
wjq.s.adjuster6370pinn.com/56/
to your browser
Licks his lips. And then his greed gets the better of him and penetr'a_te13 wlozyly 05 revolutionibuswdrazaniem wypocin
On Friday, September 10, 2004, 5:47:41 PM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
Our favorite pill spammers also try to get around SURBL now.
you can copy
wjq.s.adjuster6370pinn.com/56/
to your browser
They will fail. SpamCopURI may or may not catch these (which lack http://), but I think urirhsbl and urirhssub may.
So just list adjuster6370pinn.com and people using SA 3.0 will probably catch it.
Jeff C.
Hi!
you can copy
wjq.s.adjuster6370pinn.com/56/
to your browser
They will fail. SpamCopURI may or may not catch these (which lack http://), but I think urirhsbl and urirhssub may.
They all fail.
So just list adjuster6370pinn.com and people using SA 3.0 will probably catch it.
No. I am running SA3. No hits, and one of the the nameservers is inside SBL. Should have given hits... but it didnt.
Bye, Raymond
On Friday, September 10, 2004, 6:05:24 PM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
So just list adjuster6370pinn.com and people using SA 3.0 will probably catch it.
No. I am running SA3. No hits, and one of the the nameservers is inside SBL. Should have given hits... but it didnt.
OK I thought it was already a feature of SA to look for plain domains in the message body. At least they were talking about it since they want to duplicate the behavior of most mail clients as a matter of principle.
Perhaps you could submit it as a feature request.
Jeff C.
No. I am running SA3. No hits, and one of the the nameservers is inside SBL. Should have given hits... but it didnt.
OK I thought it was already a feature of SA to look for plain domains in the message body. At least they were talking about it since they want to duplicate the behavior of most mail clients as a matter of principle.
I hope it's ok for me to post this here - many apologies if it's not!
We are just releasing a set of SA rules to do an IADB2 lookup (and are hoping to find someone who knows both perl and SA who can take those rules and add an optional IDDB lookup to the front of them).
If there is anyone here who is running SA who would like to test the rule out for us and give us feedback, we'd love to share it with you!
Anne
Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. President/CEO Institute for Spam and Internet Public Policy Professor of Law, Lincoln Law School of SJ Committee Member, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop
On Friday, September 10, 2004, 7:21:24 PM, Anne Mitchell wrote:
We are just releasing a set of SA rules to do an IADB2 lookup (and are hoping to find someone who knows both perl and SA who can take those rules and add an optional IDDB lookup to the front of them).
If there is anyone here who is running SA who would like to test the rule out for us and give us feedback, we'd love to share it with you!
You may want to post on one of the SpamAssassin Users' list:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/MailingLists
I'm sure many folks will give the rules a try since it could be useful additional information.
Jeff C.
-
Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. -
Jeff Chan -
Raymond Dijkxhoorn